SearchRecent EntriesOUR JANUARY 2008 PREDICTIONLIBERAL BIGOTRY AND THE 'RED NECK' REBELLION OBAMA'S SOFT CORE RACISM A RETRACTION TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER PURSUIT OF PLEASURE RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE" OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: November 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
August 23, 2004NEVER RESTING NEVER SLEEPING: THE NYTIMES AGENDA ROLLS ON        Helped along by the post-modern liberal media Sen. Kerry has carefully crafted a war hero persona. He is a courageous warrior with a sensitive side who therefore deserves to be President. At the same time, the liberal media have created a Bush persona they can feel superior to: He is the bellicose fool who offends the good hearted and well meaning folk around the world. He is not a glib wordsmith, so he can be ridiculed when he speaks. Here's an example of "reporting" that simply changes the facts to convey the wanted image. It won't surprise to learn that it's author is Elizabeth Bumiller of the NYTimes. The NYTimes has decided that any mention of 9-11's impact on the city would be "exploiting" a tragedy. Mentioning reality and reminding people of how the President handled things is not sufficiently sensitive to the delicate flowers of the NYTimes. It's unfair and will make them stamp their feet and feel abused. Here is Bumiller's description of Bush's visit and the words he spoke in the ruins of the World Trade Center: "...the convention's timing would remind voters of what the campaign considers Mr. Bush's finest hour - the moment he grabbed the bullhorn in the rubble at the tip of Manhattan and shouted that the people who had knocked down the buildings would hear from him soon..."         Thus we see the liberal spinning of history in which mere facts are discarded. Instead we are given a self centered, bellicose president: he grabs, he shouts, he shouts what he is going to do to the perpetrators. The focus is entirely on Bush's personal response to bin Laden and the terrorists. He's mister macho man, looking for an excuse to fight. Only one trouble: he never uttered the clumsy, self referential words Bumiller casually attributes to him. Here's what he was inspired to say and it's obvious why it was so perfect for the moment, embracing all of us in the resolve to fight back. It was not a lengthy Clinton style, all-about-me peroration. It was clear, to the point and inspiring. "..I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you. And the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon..." I guess when President Bush spoke for all of us he shouldn't have included the reporters from the New York Times. << Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
When you consider that the GOP selected New York specifically to boost the city's reconstruction efforts, you might say that New York City and the Iraqi soccer team are tied in competition for most ungrateful
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at August 23, 2004 08:51 AM
This is silly: the New York Times is just plain asleep, without discriminating. Yesterday they printed an outrageous statement from Ken Mehlman that Kerry has "no plans for the future" without correcting it or challenging it in any way.
The Times merely wants to make money, and sloppiness is less expensive than bias (bias takes effort).
So don't try and tell us the Times is against you: no one will believe you.
Posted by: Sam at August 24, 2004 10:19 AM
In your free time, check some relevant pages about http://casino.blackjack-123.com/ CASINO ...
Posted by: CASINO at August 30, 2004 05:09 PM
I went to that gambling site, and all I saw was Grumpy making one bad bet after another. And calling the web site an idiot as he did so.
Posted by: Frank at August 31, 2004 02:32 PM
Bush's visit and the words he spoke in the ruins of the World Trade Center:
"...the convention's timing would remind voters of what the campaign considers Mr. Bush's finest hour - the moment he grabbed the bullhorn in the rubble at the tip of Manhattan and shouted that the people who had knocked down the buildings would hear from him soon..."
Posted by: online prescriptions at September 27, 2004 12:36 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)