SearchRecent EntriesNOBODY ASKED ME BUT...NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
September 08, 2004DISHONORED BY KERRY: REAL WAR HEROSHorsefeathers is delighted that John Kerry has been unable to foist his tale of warrior gallantry on the American public. Instead of being ashamed of utilizing 3 minor scrapes to bug out on his 'band of brothers', Kerry endlessly boasts of his battle courage and fantasy exploits. In the course of his macho self invention, Kerry regularly promotes himself into the ranks of war heros. He thereby casts doubt on every soldier who honestly earned his medals. Here's a reminder, courtesy of C. Alan Hopewell of some of the men dishonored by Kerry's boasts.
        None of these were "band aid" medals or earned from political connections. None of the 2nd Ranger Battalion requested to go home after four months and start an "anti-war" movement while still on active duty. Ranger Lt. Robert Edlin turned down the Congressional Medal of Honor, stating that "I must decline that because I don't want to leave my company." Actually, the monstrous guns were not installed as expected from intelligence reports. The press did not perseverate on "being lied to about nonexistent guns" and run endless stories about men killed over "faulty intelligence" or "going in without a plan." The guns were found some distance away, and were still a very real threat, armed and ready to wreak havoc upon the landing craft. The Rangers calmly disabled them with thermite grenades, saving hundreds of lives, and went on to free Europe from terrorism and dictatorship. Rudder himself commanded the 109th during the Battle of the Bulge, and, again, did not quit, thinking the war was now a "quagmire." C. Alan Hopewell, Ph.D., M. S. Psy.Pharm, ABPP << Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
Are you aware that the Swifties have changed the text on their web site yet again in response to someone pointing out conflicts in their claims?
Before we go any further, do some work.
Posted by: Sam at September 8, 2004 12:26 PM
Naah. Let's not. There are lots of idiot websites sites you can go to if that's your inclination. Rumor has it that our own in-house idiot Frank has a website.
Lets start with the article at hand.
Or, if you really want to start with "websites that changed their information", lets go in chronological order and start with all the changes on Kerry's webite since the challenges of the SwiftVets have come to light.
Or- lets start with all the changes in the stories Kerry's staff have made in telling their changing stories about Kerry's changing stories.
Or- just to make it simple- recognize that Kerry is a liar.
Meanwhile, back to the article. It is true, as the article demonstrates, that there is quite a difference between the meaning of "hero" as applied to someone like Rudder and his Ranger battalion or an opportunist and liar like John Kerry.
Posted by: Grumpy at September 8, 2004 02:28 PM
Grumpy, did you hear the latest? Bush didn't show up for duty in Massachusetts, either, as he was obliged to.
Posted by: Tad at September 8, 2004 03:08 PM
I saw that too, Tad: Boston Globe "reexamination." Don't forget, Barnes is on 60 Minutes tonight.
Posted by: Frank at September 8, 2004 03:43 PM
AWOL= Absent without leave from your assigned duty station, since President Bush was never assigned to the Alabama ANG it would be impossible for him to have been AWOL from that unit.
Posted by: logiccop at September 8, 2004 04:25 PM
Frank- you must mean "didn't I hear the oldest"-- I heard that during the 2000 election.
George Bush hasn't even asked- let alone obliged me- to vote for him based on what he did 35 years ago.
John Kerry did. The difference being, Kerry lied about what he did.
As an added plus, Kerry came back from the war and proceeded to lie about what the people he served with did.
Then he went to North Vietnam to aid and give comfort to the enemy.
Kerry is a liar.
You're an idiot.
Ever think that may have a lot to do with the polls?
Posted by: Grumpy at September 8, 2004 04:27 PM
FLorida is no longer in Bush's column and Pennsylvania is now in Kerry's. See the polls as of today.
(You'd have seen it hours ago if you'd have risked exposing yourself to other opinions by coming to my site. It's your duty as a citizen to explore other points of view, you know.)
Posted by: Frank at September 8, 2004 05:00 PM
FRANK: GET UO TO DATE. THE ZOGBY POLL YOU CITED IS DATED AUGUST 30. IN THE ENSUING TWO DAYS, ACCORDING TO MORE RECENT ZOGBY POLLS BUSH SURGED TO A DOUBLE DIGIT LEAD. THE ONLY TIME IN POLLING HISTORY THAT A CONDIDATE PULLED AHEAD AFTER LABOR DAY WAS RONALD REAGAN. ON LABOR DAY 1980 HE TRAILED BY A POINT AND BY ELECTION TIME IT WAS A LANDSLIDE.
BUSH IS WAY AHEAD, SO LIVE WITH IT.
Posted by: RUTH KING at September 8, 2004 05:52 PM
If you read the polls instead of just selecting the ones that say what you would like to hear, you would know that some polls show Kerry with an infinitesimal lead in Florida and Pennsylvania.
Others show Bush in the lead.
The only duty I have regarding your opinions is to expose them as being idiotic. I don't have to visit your site to do that. You have advertised your idiocy quite well enough here.
Posted by: Grumpy at September 8, 2004 05:57 PM
Ruth, according to that site the date of the interviews is from August 30 - Sep 3. It only started on Aug 30.
I'd agree that some of the Zogby interviews were done before Bush spoke, but certainly not all.
I'll have to dig up the link, but I believe JFK was also behind in the polls on Labor day, as well as George W Bush. Two of those three won in November, and the third in December.
Posted by: Frank at September 8, 2004 06:08 PM
AWOL
Hey Frank, you've been AWOL for awhile.
What's up?
Did you notice that if you hit that link you gave it shows George Bush ahead in projected electoral votes
Posted by: Grumpy at September 10, 2004 12:45 AM
Frank was last heard mumbling: "They're not forgeries. They're not forgeries. Please Dan say it ain't so. "
Posted by: Stephen at September 10, 2004 07:53 AM
So this guy walks into a bar, finds it filled with silly drunks. Says to himself, "What did I expect in a bar?"
Frank was mumbling anything but that, Stephen. You should get out more often. You might have noticed your hero signed a statement swearing he'd report to a unit in Massachusetts and did not? This was not from any CBS document, but from one which the White House released in February. "I must have misspoken," was Dan Bartlett's defense about what he said in 1999, claiming back then that Bush had reported.
Who needs to mumble when uncovering Bush lies is like shooting fish in a barrel?
Posted by: Frank at September 12, 2004 07:13 PM
Halsbänder http://versandhaus.gelago.de/cat17574/Damen/Wäsche/BHs-&-Dessous/Halsbänder/
Posted by: Halsbänder at September 21, 2004 09:41 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)