Search






Recent Entries

TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE

TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER

PURSUIT OF PLEASURE

RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE"

OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT

GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS

Spitzer Agonistes

BUSH IS TO BLAME

TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS

AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA




Archives

Category:
Baseball
Culture
History
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Movie/Theater Reviews
Politics
Sports
THE NEW YORK TIMES
War


Monthly:
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Old Horsefeathers Archives
 

September 17, 2004

ANNIVERSARY OF ANTIETAM: THE BLOODIEST BATTLE IN U.S. HISTORY

        Today, Sept. 17, is the 142nd anniversary of the Battle of Antietam, the bloodiest single day's fighting in American history. Horsefeathers has listened to the weepings and lamentations of our liberal media punditocracy as American casualties pass the 1000 mark in Iraq. By historical standards this is an amazingly low casualty war, but of course utopian Liberalism finds it shocking that people would actually kill and be killed to protect their country. Liberalism long ago became a shared sensibility, a faith, rather than a coherent body of ideas, that requires display of the believers' superior virtue. So when we hear the laments emanating from the Russerts and Rathers, the Brokaws and Stephanopouloses, we are actually witnessing these narcissistic celebrities in acts of revolting self-display. In our therapeutic age, these glib wordsmiths think of themselves as IMPORTANT PEOPLE who must enlighten the rest of us. Their self-righteousness is palpable; after all, they must help us to 'get in touch' with our own deep feelings of sadness and grief. In doing so, they are exhibiting their own higher "sensitivity" by drawing long faces, and pretending to grieve deeply on behalf of all of us, over each battlefield death. One wonders what they'd have made of the following:
        In 14 hours of battle, culminating in a stalemate, Antietam resulted in nine times as many Americans killed or wounded (23,000 soldiers) as took place on June 6, 1944--D-day. More soldiers were killed and wounded at the Battle of Antietam than all Americans killed and wounded in the Revolutionary War, War of 1812, Mexican War, and Spanish-American War combined.
        Imagine the depth of anti-Lincoln passions that would have been stirred if there'd been Television news coverage announcing the daily numbers of dead and wounded. Surely Lincoln would have been under tremendous pressure by the MSM to negotiate a settlement, since in their view nothing could be worth such a toll. Look at the battlefield stalemate that resulted from all the carnage. At the end of the day the exhausted armies were left where they started. Yet without the Battle of Antietam there would have been no Emancipation Proclamation and we would not be "one nation, indivisible". How fortunate that the men of Lincoln's time were realists about human nature, not yet infected by utopian fantasies. Today's highly educated, delicately metrosexual media wordsmiths should be forced to memorize the following words by John Stuart Mill:

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made or kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.





To:


From:


Message (optional):


Comments

A knowledge of history relays a sense of perspective.

Posted by: Bernard at September 17, 2004 11:15 AM

all that you say is very true, but wouldnt the plural of stephanopoulos be stephanopouli?

Posted by: akaky at September 17, 2004 01:22 PM

Plural of Stephanpoulos is too awful to contemplate. One is bad enough.

Posted by: RUTH KING at September 18, 2004 10:39 AM

Just a stone's throw from my digs here in Charlottesville is the Confederate Cementary where there are buried far more than 1000 casualties who died in the Civil War era hospitals at the University of Virginia.

All around the noble rotunda of Jefferson the floors were stained with blood and the halls knew the screams and whimpers of the dying. Virginia alone lost 17,000 killed in the Civil War, many at Antietam and Gettysburg.

In the First and Second War War 100,000 Scots were killed in action almost three quarters in the Great War.
Frankly, all this hand wringing over the low casualty totals the USA has taken sounds very wimpy. But then the liberals of today are so cowardly, effeminate, wimpy and politically correct that they would scunner Harry Truman or Scoop Jackson not to mention Andrew Jackson, an imperfect man but a great Democrat and a great solider and leader who did much to keep the union together. I cannot believe any of these men would be Democrats today. Not even Jefferson would be a Democrat today, in my opinion.

Every casualty is a a bitter loss and a costly sacrifice on the altar of freedom but it reminds us all that freedom isn't free. If it took one million American lives to assure the survival and success of our republic Americans should be prepared to pay that price. I thank God the casualties are as low as they have been but there will be more losses in the future. We can only hope that each one counts for something and that these brave soldiers will not have died in vain.

"Ne Obliviscaris"
"Do Not Forget"

"Sans Peur"
"Without Fear"

Semper Fidelis
"Always Faithful"

God Bless America and her Red, White and Blue.
"C -130 comin' down the strip,
Jump school Daddy gonna take a little trip,
Step out shuffle to the door,
Jump right out and count to four,
If that chute don't too
Bury me in my DRESS BLUES!!!!"

DRILL SONG OF US MARINES circa 1975

We Munro,
Like men of old,
we serve a worthy, lady O!
Hear our drums,
Hear our pipes,
Hear our marchin'
Three by three,
Wi' bayonet and cannon ball
We'll serve our worthy, lady, O
We'll no' flee, we'd rather dee
For we serve a worthy lady O!

SONG OF THE MUNRO COMPANY AT BALAKLAVA, 93rd Highlanders
***
O, wha can fill a coward's grave
Wha saw base as be a slave
Let them turn and flee!

By opressions woes and pains
we will drain our deartest veins
But they shall be free!

SCOTS WHA HAE (Fragment; Robert Burns)


Scunners me, really to think of all the pusillanimous wimps who call themselves my countrymen.

Reminds me of the French officer who said to the US Marine "Retreat! Run for your lives!"
and the Marine answered "Retreat? Hell, we just got here."

On another occasion a Marine NCO told his men,
"Do you want to live forever?"

The bottom line is you can't live forever.

Hide in a hole or paint your face one inch thick and in 100 years somos todos calvos -we are all sticks and bones -goners. I am going to die and you who read this is going to die. No one is master of the line of his life. Damn the Modernists: DULCE ET DECORUM PRO PATRIA MORI. Better to die serving your country than under a bridge O.D.'ed

The important thing is to live with honor and defend the land you love and what it stand for because this is the citadel of freedom and safety for your friend, your kindred, your children.

"Greater love hath no man that to lay down his life for his friend."

Our lives are just a stone upon the cairn and God willing others will carry in freedom and defend future generations so that they can live in peace and freedom.

Let the craven cowards turn and flee.

It is just what Bin Laden is counting on.

We have to be tougher than him and brave enough to take it until he is drowning in his own blood.

For such an evil killer I won't mince words. He deserves far worse but sending him to meet his final judgment will do.

AL QAIDA DELENDA EST


BUSH, BLAIR AND HOWARD...heroes of the Red, White and Blue worthy of Churchill, FDR, Lincoln, Wilson, George and Washington.

JFKerry for president...of Club Med...

Posted by: Ricardo Munro at September 18, 2004 09:06 PM

My impression over a long period of time, garnered from leftists whom I have known & some leftists whom I still know, has been that leftists’ wailing about combat deaths is decidedly absent when they strongly favor the combat. I have heard more than one leftist suddenly equate a million deaths to just one death, when the argument took such a turn as to render such an equation seemingly advantageous to their side of the argument.

* * *

I think that the plural of “Stephanopoulos” would be “Stephanopouloi.”

Posted by: ForNow at September 18, 2004 10:21 PM

That was exactly my thought when I heard that 1,000 number. So what, how long have we been over there? And we are barely reaching a thousand now after all the times we've heard this compared to Vietnam?

Blech!

Posted by: Jeffery Blanco at September 20, 2004 12:13 AM

As the dominant country in the world, against a country like Iraq, who was supposed to welcome us with flowers and sweets... Isn't anyone here a little suprised at how many more have died since the end of major combat operations? Since the capture of Saddam Hussein (which has obviously made us all safer)? Since the installation of a new transitional government, which was supposed to ease tensions?

What's the point of comparing this to Antietam? The dead at Antietam -- don't those counts include the dead from both sides, when war used completely different technologies? We're supposed to use Antietam as the new standard? That if it's less than Antietam, it's OK? Or D-Day, when the military situation was completely different?

Doesn't anyone here know an irrelevant comparison when they see one? I mean, that's like saying oh well, at least Guantanamo isn't like the Warsaw ghetto. Doesn't anyone have a sense of scope before they utter such silliness?

Posted by: Sam at September 20, 2004 07:20 PM

OK, let's pretend that the ghastly stalemate at Antietam accomplished what you claim for it. Makes those deaths meaningful, huh? What have the 1000 American deaths in Iraq accomplished? Do you really think a million American deaths there would "drown Osama in his own blood?" (and are you getting your metaphores strictly from Jihadist literature?)

And how dare you trivialize 1000 dead and thousands more horribly wounded? I am effete for condemning these losses which have been sustained mosly after "mission accomplished" was declared, given creating an endless morass that was predicted by Bush's own State Department and even his own father?

Have you gone, joined your local Guard and volunteered for Iraq? Remember Gung Ho means "pull together," not "you go while I stay home and talk trash on right-wing blogs."

Posted by: Jerry at September 21, 2004 04:56 AM

Seems the tag-team duo of Sam and Jerry are at it again, asking silly questions and making sillier comments. Sam, the whole point of Stephen's post was - as you so adeptly put it - to lend "a sense of scope", to place the casualities we've suffered in Iraq in context of what our effort is trying to accomplish. And Jerry, let me try to assuage your misplaced sense of outrage somewhat by suggesting that no-one is attempting to "trivialize 1000 dead and thousands more horribly wounded".

Maybe you could save your anger for the terrorists?

Posted by: Bernard at September 21, 2004 09:14 AM

And as I said, comparing the 1,000 we've lost to D-Day is irrelevant. Let's compare it to how many you lose in a cake walk, shall we?

Posted by: Sam at September 21, 2004 04:34 PM

Fair point, Sam: I think there were two factors supporting the war, neither of which were humanitarian.

#1: the administration's conflation of Saddam Hussein with 9/11 (roughly 60% thought he was behind 9/11 thanks to this, and roughly 60% supported the war).

#2: perceptions that it would be a cake walk.

I doubt support would have run so high had D-day-like scenarios been presented to the American people. So the relevant comparison is not to worst case scenarios but to what was expected.

Posted by: Tad at September 22, 2004 07:59 AM

You know, I bet Bush et al are really glad that the fatalities so far aren't close to D-Day. Can you imagine how low his favorability ratings would be if the fatalities were that high, given that there are no WMDs there and that Iraq was not involved in 9-11?

Posted by: Jasper at September 22, 2004 12:41 PM

Good words on Antietam. I still grieve for the US dead in Iraq, but as you say, slavery is the worst thing. TonyS

Posted by: tony steemon at September 22, 2004 08:04 PM

Bernard:
"So what, how long have we been over there? And we are barely reaching a thousand now..." Maybe not everyone is trivializing the number, but some are specifically and "putting the number in context" comes damn close. The major point being that these lives have been given creating through Bush's ineptness a morass that his own people predict a dismal best case scenario for.

"So the relevant comparison is not to worst case scenarios but to what was expected." What was to be expected was clearly spelled out in his own State Department's extensive memo, intelligence available before it was mangled by Rumsfeld's Office of Special Plans, and Bush's father's memoirs.

"...save (my) anger for the terrorists?" Like Osama, whom Bush doesn't think about much? Like the Saudis (the great majority), Egyptian, and Lebonese 9/11 terrorists with no connection to Iraq? Or you tell me: which terrorists connected to Iraq should I be saving my anger for?

Posted by: Jerry at September 22, 2004 08:36 PM

Jerry, I didn't expect a cake walk, and I gather you didn't either. But I wonder what the American people's expectations were, given the neocons who were talking about cake walks and being greeted by Whitmans Samplers. I wonder how many prepared themselves for D-day like fatalities, and, as Jasper hinted, were prepared to take them for no WMDs or involvement in 9/11?

Posted by: Sam at September 22, 2004 10:03 PM

Jerry, I forgot to say: bring some friends here. This looks like a good place to hang out. Maybe we can take over the place.

Posted by: Sam at September 22, 2004 10:05 PM

Sam -

None of 'em, bud. Not while they were being told by our President and Secretary of State that it would be as easy and clean as Gulf War I, and that the people would flock to us like adoring children when Saddam was gone. And that the presence of WMD was "incontrovertable fact" (Powell at the UN)

To slightly paraphrase Groucho, I wouldn't belng to a club like this that would have me as a memeber.

Besides, they need a place to play quietly with each other while ignoring "silly" questions and facts. Note how they resort to name calling and ignore questions of substance?

Posted by: Jerry at September 23, 2004 12:14 AM

A little fresh air never hurt anybody -- why, think about the canned questions Bush gets at his appearances.

Posted by: Jasper at September 23, 2004 08:00 AM

America would never flinch over a thousand deaths were it a worthy cause. There is no doubt in my mind but that the Iraqi people are better off without Saddam Hussein in power; but I'm not sure that this is the best way to have done it, I'm not sure if this is the best result for the world, and I'm not convinced it's stabilized the region: should democracy occur and the newly-recruited terrorists dissipate, where will they go?

Posted by: Tad at September 24, 2004 08:15 AM

Stephen, The War between the States was a sad and terrible time in our history. For anyone to use any episode from that tragedy, to rationalise what is going on in Iraq, is to mix apples with green beans. Not applicable!! The war between the states was a conflict between those that wanted a week central government, and those that believed that the Federal government had to have powers that were greater than the individual states. We invaded Iraq, and now we are occuping the country. The deaths that occured during the battle of Antietam were not glorious or even noble. It was a nightmare that accomplished nothing. And only armchair generals who never met the elephant say otherwise. Go to any VA hospital and look at the men and now women coming back from the glorious war. Ask them about the moment their bodies were torn from them by an explosive device, or grenade, or sniper bullet. then post more of this trivia, if you can. We are killing women and children, and turning the Iraqi into what they were not before, terrorist.
Lift the blinders from your eyes, I challege you, look at the result of the invasion and rape of Iraq. No true patriot is proud of what has happened, we all of us the blue and the red are responsible for those thousand dead, and sixteen thousand and counting wounded.

Posted by: larkinsjapn at September 29, 2004 04:58 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


<< Back to Horsefeathers

 

Favorite Links

Pajamas Media
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Politics Central
Michael Yon
Victor Hanson
Mideast Outpost
Captain's Quarters
ChicagoBoyz
Faultline USA
SteveForPrez
Democracy Project
Iowahawk
Instapundit
News Forum
Hotair
Real Clear Politics
Counterterrorism Blog
Ace of Spades
Contentions
Mark Steyn
Bookworm
Gateway Pundit
PoliPundit
Transatlantic Intelligencer
Sisu
Villainous Company
Bill Whittle
Eye on the UN
Armavirunque
Cox & Forkum
Michelle Malkin
Baseball Crank
Terry Teachout
No Pasaran
Power Line
Hugh Hewitt
Jihad Watch
Kim du Toit
Dhimmi Watch
Steven Plaut
Belmont Club
Scott Burgess
The Anti-Idiotarian
Insomnomaniac
Politburo Diktat
Iraq the Model
Roger Simon
Mediacrity
Shrinkwrapped
Neo-neocon
American Thinker
New English Review
Baseball Musings
Eternity Road
Heretical Ideas
The Iconoclast
Intellectual Conservative
Vodkapundit
The Corner
Davids Medienkritik
Samizdata
Volokh Conspiracy
Dinocrat
Scott Ott
Milt's File
Daily Pundit
Google
Search WWW Search www.doctor-horsefeathers.com


Extras

Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Design by Sekimori