SearchRecent EntriesTELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKETALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER PURSUIT OF PLEASURE RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE" OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS Spitzer Agonistes BUSH IS TO BLAME TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
November 21, 2004FALLUJAH: THE MSM'S TET FANTASY        Unchastened by the election, reactionary Liberalism continues its efforts to derail the war on Islamo-Fascism. Through the eyes of the MSM---the NYTimes, Washington Post, the Sunday morning TV punditocracy---Fallujah was a battle between a noble, outgunned Iraqi 'insurgency' and America's "...best marines, its most proficient killers..."(yes you read it right: it's 'insurgents' vs. 'killers'!) The swift capture of Fallujah is taxing the imagination of Arab journalists and -- sadly -- our own. How does one portray a remarkable American victory as if it were of little consequence, or even a defeat? For CNN's Walter Rodgers, camped out in front the main U.S. military hospital in Germany, you do this by emphasizing American casualties. For The New York Times and The Washington Post, you do this by emphasizing conflict elsewhere in Iraq. But the news organs that liken temporary terrorist success in Mosul (the police stations they overran were recaptured the next day) with what happened to the terrorists in Fallujah is false equivalence of the worst kind. If I find a quarter in the street, it doesn't make up for having lost $1,000 in a poker game the night before. The resistance has suffered a loss of more than 2,000 combatants, out of a total force estimated by U.S. Central Command at about 5,000 (other estimates are higher) as well as its only secure base in the country. But both the Arab media and ours emphasize that the attack on Fallujah has made a lot of Arabs mad. By this logic, once we've killed all the terrorists, they'll be invincible. "The experience of human history has been the more people you kill, the weaker they get," Thompson noted..."
<< Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
Jack Kelley is right "...Fallujah ranks up there with Iwo Jima, Inchon and Hue as one of the greatest triumphs of American arms, though you'd have a hard time discerning that from what you read in the newspapers." Please note that the NYT uses post Vietnam editing unlike Jack Kelley. Marine as in a Marine is a proper noun and it should be capitalized unless you are writing for Castro's Gramna then of course neither God (god; dios) nor Marine can be captialized. Of its the 'insurgents' vs. "marine" 'killers'. Of course, we can add 'baby-killer' also if we are John Kerry and co. There is a great Scottish word for this SCUNNER meaning to completely and thoroughly DISGUST. The Liberal Inquistion of the New York Times SCUNNERS ME.
The book to read is END OF ILLUSIONS. Bush, Blair and Howard are keeping us safe from additional terrorist attacks and are REDUCING the chance of WWIII or an attack with WMD by rooting out the terrorists in their nests. Unlike Vietnam we are gutting their supply and training centers. Vietnam failed because we allowed FRANCE, BRITAIN -yes even Britain- China and Russia to sell food, munitions and supplies without hinderance for most of the war. All because LBJ had no balls really because China had A-bombs. We should have mined Haiphong Harbor from the beginning and bombed all the dikes OR NOT INTERVENED AT ALL.
At least Mr. Bush, Mr. Blair and Mr. Howard have a plan and a goal unlike LBJ who nearly wrecked this country economically, morally and militarily. Yes, my father and my whole family supported LBJ (and Humphrey and JFK before that) 100%. My father said it was the worst mistake of his life because it set up the take over of the Democratic party by the Quota Loving (Social) Democratic McGovernites in the 1968-1972.
I just got a call Saturday night from a former student. He was at the funeral mass of a young Marine Lance Corporal who died in the service of his country under very tragic circumstances. We all knew him, we respected him and, yes, we loved him and his friends. The men of honor, the young braves who enlisted after 9/11 to defend America without fear or hesitation. Those are the heroes, they are Marines, as you said, worthy of the Devil Dogs or the heroes of Henderson Field or the Frozen Chosin or the men of Khe Sahn. As long as we have men like this America will endure. Bin Laden, beware, they are coming for you and your ilk and you will go the way of the Madhi and the Thugs and Herr Hitler to whom you owe so much more than you realize. The worst punishment imaginable for the likes of Bin Laden, whom I believe to be a religious man, is to realize the horror that he served not God but has become in fact Mr. Screwtape's Disciple. I almost feel pity for him Almost.
Here is an old triad of the common sense tradition:
There is a peace that comes only after war.
Do not seek the fight but shun it not.
Fight the good fight and hit hard:The killing of a tyrant is justice.
And as Burns sang
LAY THE PROUD USURPERS LOW,
TYRANTS FALL IN EVERY FOE
LIBERTY's IN EVERY BLOW
LET US DO OR DEE!
That's the spirit we need in this fight. We dare not pull back now and give in to those so called 'insurgents' AKA the Muj, the Murder Cultists. I recall Muhammad said those who harm people of the book will not even smell paradise. Remember who started this. There is such a thing as a just war. Sure there are good Muslims they are proving it every day in most of Iraq but there are the Muj extremists. They must be expunged as were the cults of Assassins and Thugs to the very last and without mercy as long as they remain in the field.
Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro
at November 22, 2004 09:41 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)