Search






Recent Entries

TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE

TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER

PURSUIT OF PLEASURE

RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE"

OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT

GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS

Spitzer Agonistes

BUSH IS TO BLAME

TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS

AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA




Archives

Category:
Baseball
Culture
History
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Movie/Theater Reviews
Politics
Sports
THE NEW YORK TIMES
War


Monthly:
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Old Horsefeathers Archives
 

November 24, 2004

HORSEFEATHERS CONTEST: RENAME WASHINGTON NATIONALS


It is nice to know that even with the heavy schedule that Washington D.C. has on its agenda—Iraq, the CIA, Social Security, Tax Reform, Election Denial—it still has time to devote to naming its new baseball team: The Washington Nationals. In a sense the new name is not surprising. In a city which is dominated by bureaucracy it is expectable that the choice of name would turn out to be the safest, least offensive, most colorless, most redundant name possible. Most baseball teams try to instill terror in their opponents with their names—the Giants, the Indians, the Diamondbacks, the Bucaneers, the Pirates. Or there are those team names that generate fierce pride and admiration in the courage and strength of their teams—the Braves, the Rangers, the Astros, the Yankees.

Then there are those teams that turn to their gentler, even maternal sides—the Cubs, the Blue Jays, the Orioles, the Cardinals. And those that appeal to the power of religion and goodness to win out over their opponents—the Angels, the Padres. And the animals—Devil Rays, Marlins; the minerals—the Rockies; fortunately no vegetables unless you consider the Soxes, White and Red, to be vegetable derivatives.

In any case all of our baseball teams try to take vivid, colorful, concrete names, the names of things, not concepts. The word National is a concept that requires a dictionary definition: “of or relating to a nation.” And when you turn to Nation you find: “Nation: a territorial division containing a body of people of one or more nationalities and usually characterized by relatively large size and independent status.” Taking this definition into account, it is easy to see that the name Nationals is totally inappropriate because DC is not independent and is small in size. Besides which, “Nationals” seems to imply that the team is the team of the nation which it certainly will not be since baseball like politics and real estate is always local.

Thus HORSEFEATHERS proposes a contest to rename the Washington Nationals (prize to be decided later) and will start the ball rolling with one or two suggestions.

The Washington:
Bosses
Crooks
Log-rollers
Hacks
Big Shots
Ducks (Lame)
Stumpers
Hopefuls
Wannabees
Baby Kissers
Dark Horses
Ward Heelers
Pussy-footers
Mudslingers

Send in your entries early and often. Any number can play.





To:


From:


Message (optional):


Comments

When I think of Washington DC I think of Monuments, so why not name the team the Washington DC Monuments, or Granites, or Marbleheads. Should you insist on keeping our 'lustrous potentates in mind, then Thiefs, or Spenders, or Cons, or Grafts. Or, since the United States of America is a Republic, why not Washington DC Republicans

Posted by: Chuck [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 24, 2004 06:05 PM

Yale:

As a former Washingtonian and Senators fan who has never gotten over their transfer to Dallas, and as someone who thought that the current Washington mayor's deep-sixing of the name "Senators" because Washington doesn't have any real senators was a piece of annoying political grandstanding, I applaud your contest.

How about:

Mugwumps
Stalwarts
Half-Breeds
Doughfaces

Though these all are historical, the first and last especially so aptly describe today's pols that they might be worth reviving.

Then there's always

Bureaucrats
Dollar Diplomats
Fat Cats
Centralizers

etc.

Best regards
Robert Spencer
Director, Jihad Watch
www.jihadwatch.org

Posted by: jihadwatch [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 27, 2004 02:44 PM

Dear Yale: Since the coming of the Nationals means more baseball in my life and baseball is life -well, an important part of my American life- I am just happy that the coming of the Nationals means more baseball on the radio and the chance to see some favorite teams on a lovely Summer afternoon. I tolerate night games but can't see as well under artificial light -hence the curtailing of my baseball career at age 15 to my great sorrow. People who don't know me well can't imagine that at age 15 I would have given everything up to have a chance to play major league ball. The was the second great illusion of my youth. The first was wishing, at age 5 , to be an Argyll like Auld Pop and his old comrades in arms because it seemed great to have so many friends and kilts and toasts to the Old Regiment. Needless to say, history and geography solved that question early though not without some regret. I then spent the next 15 years playing baseball or seeking Brigadoon mostly without success. But Baseball was always great. Boozing was not the thing but going with family was the thing. I loved keeping score and talking about the game. I always enjoyed it much more than the craze of football and basketball. In basketball I couldn't stand those damn buzzers and the squeeking of the sneakers. The only times I attended basketball games as a young man I was literally paid to attend. I was never invited to football games and of course, thank God, NYU didn't have a football team. That would have distracted from culture and baseball. I suppose I was a sober "nerd" but I enjoyed going to hear string quartets or the opera when the baseball season was over. UVA has big football games but I hardly know they are there except to drive around to avoid the traffic and stay away to avoid the underage drunken students. We are living a modern mini prohibition. Now I think the NATS is in fact a good name because GNATS are any of various small usually biting flies. There are a lot of GNATS in Washington.However, it could be argued that the pols in DC are more rapacious and parasitic. This is true so perhaps BLOODSUCKERS would be a good names. They could be called the BLOODS for short though this might incite gang violence I know. Alternatively they could be called the SUCKERS. That would describe most of the taxpayers who have to foot the bill. Of course calling the new team the LEECHES after the fresh water annelid worms could be appropriate because these worms have a sucker on each end. Win or lose the Democrats and Republicans have suckers on both ends. There is an old Highland saying THA AN DEALA A'SNAMH, THIG FRASAN BLATH ROIMH FHEASGAR which means for all you Lowlanders out there, The leech is swimming, warm showers will come. In America, the leeches are always swimming in a river of tax payer generated cash and most distrubing borrowed cash. My late father, who personally experienced the Decline and Fall of the British Empire (and the Pound) always worried about the 'bubble' of trade deficits and the huge personal borrowing of Americans. Always a thrify but generous Scot he worried about money -too much perhaps- but I never dismissed his wise opinion and think there must be something in it. Of course, the leeches won't be around when the bill comes due. Of course, and I kid not, DEALA, leech is also synonymous with COW DUNG and the SHEEP'S TEAT. You can make of that what you will. Some of you might think me hard but the truth is I would respect our pols more if AFFIRMATIVE ACTION applied to them, if they had to rely on SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE like the rest of us etc and if they lived with more republican virtue in the classical sense of the word. Perhaps there are dedicated public servants out there but frankly most of those I have met are in the classroom not in the halls of congress. So as a final word on worms and gnats and baseball nicknames maybe NATS is a good nickname and maybe it was always meant somewhat jocularly. But I feel sorry for the Orioles. They are unlikely to get presidents to throw out the opening ball anymore. HORSEFEATHERS contest to rename the Washington Nationals is worthy. However, having visited the PRICE OF FREEDOM at the Smithsonian and having seen George Washington's sword and uniform I think it quite true to say of Washington and his name: SING OH! NOT E'EN HIS SON'S DISGRACE CAN QUITE DESTROY HIS GLORY'S TRACE. Washington Nationals has a nice ring. They SHOULD incorporate colonial and Washingtonian effects, in my opinion. And of course they will be probably FIRST IN PEACE FIRST IN WAR AND LAST IN THE NATIONAL LEAGUE. (prize to be decided later) and will start the ball rolling with one or two suggestions.
Posted by Richard "Ricardo" Munro at November 28, 2004 12:07 PM


Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2004 12:13 PM

Since my prior comment never was posted, unsatisfactory for whatever reason, I will try again here.

Washington DC is known throughout the nation for other than the politicians. Mostly for Monuments and Museums. Therefore, my recommended name would be the Washington Ms (you know, like the Oakland As) The M of course standing for monuments, museums and mayhem.

Of course if your wanting to highlight the fact that DC is the seat of National Government, then possibly Tics, or Polis, deriving both from the term Politics. Or how about RepublicRats. Or just Rats.

No, I think Ms might actually be preferable than Nationals, or the others suggested.

Chuck

Posted by: Chuck [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2004 03:18 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


<< Back to Horsefeathers

 

Favorite Links

Pajamas Media
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Politics Central
Michael Yon
Victor Hanson
Mideast Outpost
Captain's Quarters
ChicagoBoyz
Faultline USA
SteveForPrez
Democracy Project
Iowahawk
Instapundit
News Forum
Hotair
Real Clear Politics
Counterterrorism Blog
Ace of Spades
Contentions
Mark Steyn
Bookworm
Gateway Pundit
PoliPundit
Transatlantic Intelligencer
Sisu
Villainous Company
Bill Whittle
Eye on the UN
Armavirunque
Cox & Forkum
Michelle Malkin
Baseball Crank
Terry Teachout
No Pasaran
Power Line
Hugh Hewitt
Jihad Watch
Kim du Toit
Dhimmi Watch
Steven Plaut
Belmont Club
Scott Burgess
The Anti-Idiotarian
Insomnomaniac
Politburo Diktat
Iraq the Model
Roger Simon
Mediacrity
Shrinkwrapped
Neo-neocon
American Thinker
New English Review
Baseball Musings
Eternity Road
Heretical Ideas
The Iconoclast
Intellectual Conservative
Vodkapundit
The Corner
Davids Medienkritik
Samizdata
Volokh Conspiracy
Dinocrat
Scott Ott
Milt's File
Daily Pundit
Google
Search WWW Search www.doctor-horsefeathers.com


Extras

Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Design by Sekimori