SearchRecent EntriesTELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKETALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER PURSUIT OF PLEASURE RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE" OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS Spitzer Agonistes BUSH IS TO BLAME TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
November 24, 2004HORSEFEATHERS CONTEST: RENAME WASHINGTON NATIONALS
Then there are those teams that turn to their gentler, even maternal sides—the Cubs, the Blue Jays, the Orioles, the Cardinals. And those that appeal to the power of religion and goodness to win out over their opponents—the Angels, the Padres. And the animals—Devil Rays, Marlins; the minerals—the Rockies; fortunately no vegetables unless you consider the Soxes, White and Red, to be vegetable derivatives. In any case all of our baseball teams try to take vivid, colorful, concrete names, the names of things, not concepts. The word National is a concept that requires a dictionary definition: “of or relating to a nation.” And when you turn to Nation you find: “Nation: a territorial division containing a body of people of one or more nationalities and usually characterized by relatively large size and independent status.” Taking this definition into account, it is easy to see that the name Nationals is totally inappropriate because DC is not independent and is small in size. Besides which, “Nationals” seems to imply that the team is the team of the nation which it certainly will not be since baseball like politics and real estate is always local. Thus HORSEFEATHERS proposes a contest to rename the Washington Nationals (prize to be decided later) and will start the ball rolling with one or two suggestions. The Washington: Send in your entries early and often. Any number can play. << Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
When I think of Washington DC I think of Monuments, so why not name the team the Washington DC Monuments, or Granites, or Marbleheads. Should you insist on keeping our 'lustrous potentates in mind, then Thiefs, or Spenders, or Cons, or Grafts. Or, since the United States of America is a Republic, why not Washington DC Republicans
Posted by: Chuck
at November 24, 2004 06:05 PM
Yale:
As a former Washingtonian and Senators fan who has never gotten over their transfer to Dallas, and as someone who thought that the current Washington mayor's deep-sixing of the name "Senators" because Washington doesn't have any real senators was a piece of annoying political grandstanding, I applaud your contest.
How about:
Mugwumps
Stalwarts
Half-Breeds
Doughfaces
Though these all are historical, the first and last especially so aptly describe today's pols that they might be worth reviving.
Then there's always
Bureaucrats
Dollar Diplomats
Fat Cats
Centralizers
etc.
Best regards
Robert Spencer
Director, Jihad Watch
www.jihadwatch.org
Posted by: jihadwatch
at November 27, 2004 02:44 PM
Dear Yale: Since the coming of the Nationals means more baseball in my life and baseball is life -well, an important part of my American life- I am just happy that the coming of the Nationals means more baseball on the radio and the chance to see some favorite teams on a lovely Summer afternoon. I tolerate night games but can't see as well under artificial light -hence the curtailing of my baseball career at age 15 to my great sorrow. People who don't know me well can't imagine that at age 15 I would have given everything up to have a chance to play major league ball. The was the second great illusion of my youth. The first was wishing, at age 5 , to be an Argyll like Auld Pop and his old comrades in arms because it seemed great to have so many friends and kilts and toasts to the Old Regiment. Needless to say, history and geography solved that question early though not without some regret. I then spent the next 15 years playing baseball or seeking Brigadoon mostly without success. But Baseball was always great. Boozing was not the thing but going with family was the thing. I loved keeping score and talking about the game. I always enjoyed it much more than the craze of football and basketball. In basketball I couldn't stand those damn buzzers and the squeeking of the sneakers. The only times I attended basketball games as a young man I was literally paid to attend. I was never invited to football games and of course, thank God, NYU didn't have a football team. That would have distracted from culture and baseball. I suppose I was a sober "nerd" but I enjoyed going to hear string quartets or the opera when the baseball season was over. UVA has big football games but I hardly know they are there except to drive around to avoid the traffic and stay away to avoid the underage drunken students. We are living a modern mini prohibition. Now I think the NATS is in fact a good name because GNATS are any of various small usually biting flies. There are a lot of GNATS in Washington.However, it could be argued that the pols in DC are more rapacious and parasitic. This is true so perhaps BLOODSUCKERS would be a good names. They could be called the BLOODS for short though this might incite gang violence I know. Alternatively they could be called the SUCKERS. That would describe most of the taxpayers who have to foot the bill. Of course calling the new team the LEECHES after the fresh water annelid worms could be appropriate because these worms have a sucker on each end. Win or lose the Democrats and Republicans have suckers on both ends. There is an old Highland saying THA AN DEALA A'SNAMH, THIG FRASAN BLATH ROIMH FHEASGAR which means for all you Lowlanders out there, The leech is swimming, warm showers will come. In America, the leeches are always swimming in a river of tax payer generated cash and most distrubing borrowed cash. My late father, who personally experienced the Decline and Fall of the British Empire (and the Pound) always worried about the 'bubble' of trade deficits and the huge personal borrowing of Americans. Always a thrify but generous Scot he worried about money -too much perhaps- but I never dismissed his wise opinion and think there must be something in it. Of course, the leeches won't be around when the bill comes due. Of course, and I kid not, DEALA, leech is also synonymous with COW DUNG and the SHEEP'S TEAT. You can make of that what you will. Some of you might think me hard but the truth is I would respect our pols more if AFFIRMATIVE ACTION applied to them, if they had to rely on SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE like the rest of us etc and if they lived with more republican virtue in the classical sense of the word. Perhaps there are dedicated public servants out there but frankly most of those I have met are in the classroom not in the halls of congress. So as a final word on worms and gnats and baseball nicknames maybe NATS is a good nickname and maybe it was always meant somewhat jocularly. But I feel sorry for the Orioles. They are unlikely to get presidents to throw out the opening ball anymore. HORSEFEATHERS contest to rename the Washington Nationals is worthy. However, having visited the PRICE OF FREEDOM at the Smithsonian and having seen George Washington's sword and uniform I think it quite true to say of Washington and his name: SING OH! NOT E'EN HIS SON'S DISGRACE CAN QUITE DESTROY HIS GLORY'S TRACE. Washington Nationals has a nice ring. They SHOULD incorporate colonial and Washingtonian effects, in my opinion. And of course they will be probably FIRST IN PEACE FIRST IN WAR AND LAST IN THE NATIONAL LEAGUE. (prize to be decided later) and will start the ball rolling with one or two suggestions.
Posted by Richard "Ricardo" Munro at November 28, 2004 12:07 PM
Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro
at November 28, 2004 12:13 PM
Since my prior comment never was posted, unsatisfactory for whatever reason, I will try again here.
Washington DC is known throughout the nation for other than the politicians. Mostly for Monuments and Museums. Therefore, my recommended name would be the Washington Ms (you know, like the Oakland As) The M of course standing for monuments, museums and mayhem.
Of course if your wanting to highlight the fact that DC is the seat of National Government, then possibly Tics, or Polis, deriving both from the term Politics. Or how about RepublicRats. Or just Rats.
No, I think Ms might actually be preferable than Nationals, or the others suggested.
Chuck
Posted by: Chuck
at November 29, 2004 03:18 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)