SearchRecent EntriesTELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKETALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER PURSUIT OF PLEASURE RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE" OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS Spitzer Agonistes BUSH IS TO BLAME TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
December 15, 2004LIBERAL ARTS: REMEMBER WHAT IT WAS LIKE THEN?SEE WHAT IT’S LIKE NOW
Forty-six percent of students interviewed at the U.S. News top 50 colleges and universities reported that their professors used the classroom to present their personal political views and 29% said they had to agree with their professors’ political views to get a good grade. In case there’s any uncertainty about what those views are, during the recent campaign 68% of students reported that their professors made negative comments about President Bush and almost as many said their instructors praised Senator Kerry. They’re probably not doing so in courses on American history or the workings of the U.S. government, though, because these subjects have disappeared from the requirements of all but 14% of the colleges studies, along with classic works of literature and the study of economics, no longer required at any of the top schools surveyed. The ACTA study, titled The Hollow Core: Failure of the General Education Curriculum, reveals what it is that has taken the place of history, literature, and an understanding of American culture and institutions. Herewith some edifying examples: The University of Colorado’s Quantitative Reasoning and Mathematical Skills requirement may be satisfied by “Mathematics for the Environment,” described as “an interdisciplinary course where analysis of real phenomena such as acid rain, population growth, and road-killed rabbits in Nevada leads to consideration of various fundamental concepts in mathematics.” At Barnard College the literature requirement may be satisfied by “Queer Diasporas: Race, Sexuality, and Migration.” At the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, students can fulfill their Social Science requirement with “Environmental Advocacy.” What ever happened to the liberal arts? Well, “liberal” got redefined.No longer a place where the triumphs and achievements of the past are transmitted to the young, a university is now a place where they can wallow in the latest fads—and get humanities credits for such courses as “History of Comic Book Art” (Indiana University), “Rock Music From 1970 to Present” (University of Minnesota) or “Survey of World Cinema” (University of Illinois). At Duke the social science requirement can be met by a course on “Campus Culture and Drinking,” at Bryn Mawr the humanities requirement can be satisfied with “Love and Money.” It’s a safe bet it has nothing to do with love of learning. << Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
Truly, sometimes there just aren't any words.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto
at December 15, 2004 05:29 PM
My son is in his junior year at UMaine, Orono. My daughter is applying to colleges for Fall 2005 freshman entry.
Based on my son's experience at a small, rural university and my experience over the past 25 years of working with plenty of intelligent, articulate, and creative people who attended small, relatively unknown colleges, as well as a fair number of dopes from so called elite schools we are convinced that finding a (or The) school that will help and/or allow our daughter to put the most into, and therefore get the most out of, her college education is the primary goal.
Interestingly enough, internet resources such as Horsefeathers, CriticalMass, National Review Online, and FIRE have been invaluable in that search.
The other activity that has proven to be very informative has been the college visit. You can learn an inordinate amount of information about a school's philosophy from the boiler plate prospective student presentation that begins a typical visit.
At one school in particular the audience of 40 - 50 of us (exclusively white folks) were treated to a 40 minute presentation on the school's aggressive campaign to diversify the student population by way of an aggressive inner city outreach campaign. We heard precious little about academic programs and academic standards.
Which is not to say that outreach, by iteself, is a bad thing, but the blindingly obvious mismatch between the message and the audience was shocking.
She won't be applying there.
Posted by: too many steves
at December 18, 2004 07:39 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)