Search






Recent Entries

LIBERAL BIGOTRY AND THE 'RED NECK' REBELLION

OBAMA'S SOFT CORE RACISM

A RETRACTION

TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE

TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER

PURSUIT OF PLEASURE

RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE"

OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT

GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS

Spitzer Agonistes




Archives

Category:
Baseball
Culture
History
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Movie/Theater Reviews
Politics
Sports
THE NEW YORK TIMES
War


Monthly:
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Old Horsefeathers Archives
 

March 14, 2005

THE NEW YORKER BIDS TO RESTORE ITS REPUTATION FOR HUMOR

        It is a long time since Horsefeathers turned to The New Yorker for high quality comic writing. Truth be told, we rarely read it any more. The weekly anti-Bush rants of Jimmy Carter's speech writer, Hendrik Hertzberg, finally caused our eyes to glaze over once too often. However, in the wake of the Presidential election, the New Yorker's strenuous efforts to raise the spirits of their liberal elite readership is producing some hilarious comic writing. The New Yorker shares the view that the Democrats lost because they didn't seem tough enough. So the task is to make them look (rather than be) tough! No need to consider their message of nuanced, metrosexual, multilateral UN worship; no, it was nothing but a failure to effectively convey their inner toughness. They were so much smarter, so much deeper in their understanding than the dumb cowboy. What message could possibly have misled the public into their resounding verdict on the Dems- the guys who leave the barroom when the fight begins? It's got to be time for a makeover. Jeffrey Goldberg sets out to remedy the problem by offering up a lengthy portrait of a real tough Democrat--none other than the camera hogging, blow dried plagiarist Joe Biden! Biden's preening, coiffed presence suggests he really could kill---for camera time. Watch out Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden may trample you in a race for face time on Meet The Press.
        The whole Goldberg article is amusing. Did Goldberg mean to leave the reader with the impression of Biden the fool, a blowhard who tries to convey his toughness by liberal use of curse words? Goldberg first establishes Biden's limited geopolitical intelligence by quoting his assessment of Bush's policies towards Yasser Arafat. No mention of Bush's break with the longstanding policy of cozying up to the old terrorist, and instead isolating him and rendering him politically impotent. No, “This is a very lucky President,” Biden said. “Why did Arafat die on his watch? I mean, give me a break.” That last, "give me a break" is particularly rich. Yes, Joe it's all about you and we'll try to give you a break. Another instance of his deep understanding came in his pompously condescending advice to Condeleeza Rice: “For God’s sake, don’t listen to Rumsfeld. He doesn’t know what in the hell he’s talking about on this.” Of course, Joe knows. But it remains for Biden to establish his toughness credentials with the sympathetic interviewer. He does so by letting fly a string of obscenities reminiscent of a loud mouthed schoolyard bully. This is Senator Biden's assessment of his Republican colleagues who differed with him over policy towards Bosnia. "What is so transformational in the last four years is that these assholes who wouldn’t give President Clinton the authority to use force” have now become, he said, moral interventionists. “Give me a fucking break.” This time Joe asks not just for "a break" but for a "fucking break". What a guy! I'd really want him next to me in a foxhole. He'd probably curse his fate and blame the Sec'y of Defense for getting him into the predicament.
For the rest of the article see here.





To:


From:


Message (optional):


Comments

Neil Kinnock never uses this kind of vulgar language, does he?

Posted by: Mark_Belt [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 15, 2005 01:30 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


<< Back to Horsefeathers

 

Favorite Links

Pajamas Media
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Politics Central
Michael Yon
Victor Hanson
Mideast Outpost
Captain's Quarters
ChicagoBoyz
Faultline USA
SteveForPrez
Democracy Project
Iowahawk
Instapundit
News Forum
Hotair
Real Clear Politics
Counterterrorism Blog
Ace of Spades
Contentions
Mark Steyn
Bookworm
Gateway Pundit
PoliPundit
Transatlantic Intelligencer
Sisu
Villainous Company
Bill Whittle
Eye on the UN
Armavirunque
Cox & Forkum
Michelle Malkin
Baseball Crank
Terry Teachout
No Pasaran
Power Line
Hugh Hewitt
Jihad Watch
Kim du Toit
Dhimmi Watch
Steven Plaut
Belmont Club
Scott Burgess
The Anti-Idiotarian
Insomnomaniac
Politburo Diktat
Iraq the Model
Roger Simon
Mediacrity
Shrinkwrapped
Neo-neocon
American Thinker
New English Review
Baseball Musings
Eternity Road
Heretical Ideas
The Iconoclast
Intellectual Conservative
Vodkapundit
The Corner
Davids Medienkritik
Samizdata
Volokh Conspiracy
Dinocrat
Scott Ott
Milt's File
Daily Pundit
Google
Search WWW Search www.doctor-horsefeathers.com


Extras

Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Design by Sekimori