SearchRecent EntriesNOBODY ASKED ME BUT...NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... NOBODY ASKED ME BUT... ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
July 14, 2005THE NYTIMES CAN'T UNDERSTAND        The New York Times is baffled. In one of their chin pulling, deeply empathic investigations into the backgrounds of the 4 savage London jihadis--oh,, excuse us, they were cricket loving, charming young men-it troubles them to report they found no explanation. No explanation, why? After all, one of them, Mr. Tanweer was "infinitely likable", and "...He was a good lad, so down-to-earth," said a friend who played cricket with him the day before the bombing..." This would be perfect for the NYTimes psychobabblers: a 'good lad' driven to desparation and suicide by deprivation and discrimination. Still, they came up empty in their search for evidence. They throw up their hands, baffled and unable to comprehend. For such highly intelligent wordsmiths this is remarkable. Yet maybe not so, for if your investigation admits of only one sort of explanation, one in keeping with a utopian liberal therapeutic view of human nature, then such savagery makes no sense. To her credit, Lizette Alvarez, (where does the Times find such journalists? Is there a farm system for useful idiots?)unlike so many of her colleagues, doesn't simply invent a liberal 'narrative'. Instead she seems deeply baffled: Lives of Three Men Offer Little to Explain Attacks. It's a real problem for a multi-cultural, Liberal utopian journalist, steeped in the notion that Islamists are reacting violently to oppression by Western imperialists and the Neo-con hegemonists. Their therapeutic view, the 'We're depraved on account of we're deprived' stance can't quite figure this one out. Ms. Alvarez makes a half hearted attempt to cite the usual cant about suicide bombers: "...They grew up in neighborhoods where no jobs, or bad jobs, are just as common as steady jobs. They lived on blocks where people from all over the world - from Pakistan to Kosovo, Jamaica to Uganda - do not so much live together as collide with one another or, at best, keep a separate peace.
<< Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
I read that article too and had the same reaction. The good Liberal Secularists should read Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire which deals with the Muslim invasion of Spain and France and the fall of Constantinople. Gibbon, a Pale Deistic Anglican and one time Catholic, may have thought religion was the triumph of Barbarism.
If Christianity, particular Catholicism, was a malignant force in history to Gibbon at least Gibbon had no doubts that Islam was potentially a great threat to liberty and the West. Gibbon had no illusions. A good book to read (beside Gibbon’s DECLINE AND FALL) is END OF ILLUSIONS. Another good book would be to read David Howard’s BLUE NILE AND WHITE NILE. The Madhi and Bin Laden have a lot in common.
Unlike the NYT I know the stench of a great, great evil. How can they be so naïve not to recognize it? Happy young cricketers do not become suicide-homicide bombers. The low value British schools offered him nothing –not even patriotism. Islam offered order, spirituality, brotherhood, and freedom from the moral chaos and immorality of the (dying?) Secular West.
.
I, like most Christians, can cultivate my own garden and peacefully coexist with Liberal Europacifist Secular Humanists. I know the Roe effect is such that power in the USA tend towards the Red States and the Sun belt of the West and the South. I am deeply concerned however that ‘hard American” is a rump state and that only the Hinterland (Idaho,Iowa Texas San Joaquin Valley) is bearing the burden of the war. Europe is almost supine. Even Britain after all can only muster 15,000 troops or so for the Balkans , Afghanistan and Iraq. France probably could not even win a war in its own suburbs against a Muslim intifada.
But no such peaceful coexistence is possible with Islamofascism. With Islam ,yes, possibly, but not with Islamofascism or Bin Ladenism.
Recently I visited at New York and Washington I had a deep sense of CIANALAS for I may never –we may never see theses places again. One day soon they may be just cinders. I find it incredible that people do not believe the extent of the danger.
Despiritualized learning is the plague or our modern Post Christian civilization. Many things are hidden from the learned and intelligent. That’s why the Big Liberals and Europacifists are so blind.
We in the West are in great, great danger. Even the feminists and sangerites need to know that if we lose their sacred freedoms then their phoney unhappy histories of “oppression” will be rubbed out as well. The day will come when women of the West will wish they had more real men..
Yes, indeed, PRAISE THE LORD AND PASS THE AMMUNITION. WE are going to need plenty of both. The question is do we have enough left to counter this menace? Slowly we may be sinking and Europe is sinking faster than we are…..EXCEPT FOR THE LORD THE WATCHMAN WAKETH IN VAIN…..Ps 127.
ONE MORE THING….AL QAIDA DELENDA EST…Al Qaida must be destroyed. Muslims of honor must repudiate Islamofascism and Terrorism as well. If not they dishonor their faith and God, in my humble opinion. IF not they and we may be headed towards Armageddon....WWIII. I can see it through a glass but darkly but sense that neither Islam nor our civlization will survive such a holocaust. The cockroaches will but we won't. Who could want that? We cannot let it slide into that and it could. That is, I am certain the terrible terrible truth. It is 1936 all over again and 1939 and 1941 are just around the corner. Or maybe it is 711 and 1453 all over again.....or 1571.....only time will tell.
Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro
at July 14, 2005 09:24 PM
One of the most glaring mistakes that we in the civilized world continually make is to assume that the Islamofascist murderers who are at war with us, share our values and that the problems between us are due to "misunderstandings." They undersatnd us all too well, that is why they are at war with us. This is not a conflict over territory such as Germany and France squabbling over Alsace-Lorraine. This is an attempt to reimpose the 9th century Caliphate over Chrstianity, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism
Posted by: Ripper
at July 15, 2005 10:46 AM
What has become so terribly commonplace that it's fodder for late night comedians is the Incredulous Neighbor, the one who says, "I can't believed he butchered his wife, and children, and shot the dog. He was always so friendly and kept up his yard."
What is unique is anyone at the NYT using a phrase like ". . . until religion set him straight."
Posted by: Mark_Belt
at July 15, 2005 02:39 PM
The mindless dribble of the NY Times is a direct reflection of a delicate imbalance. When a child is picked last for dodge ball over and over again they may very well grow up to write for the NY Times. These expressionists need to convey the holistic goodness of the 3 bombers and their misunderstood lives. These poor bombers were misunderstood soccer players is all? How can a nation of Rockwell-ian Americans programmed to think looking through a knot whole in a fence, to get a glimpse of a baseball game, not be guilty.
Drug test a baseball player and hug an international soccer player as he boards a Double Decker bus NY TIMES. Don’t you dare apologize for me, or my Fathers Grand Children? I am sure the Times can relate to the decision to throw baseball out of the Olympic Games too.
Side note, a rush to use the word eclectic to describe people who see a bigger picture has charged upon the scene over the last 2 decades. Eclectic loving people to me are nothing more than people who have no idea what they stand for. I say stand for something or settle for what is shoved down your throat.
Posted by: akabaseball
at July 21, 2005 12:07 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)