Search






Recent Entries

OUR JANUARY 2008 PREDICTION

LIBERAL BIGOTRY AND THE 'RED NECK' REBELLION

OBAMA'S SOFT CORE RACISM

A RETRACTION

TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE

TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER

PURSUIT OF PLEASURE

RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE"

OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT

GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS




Archives

Category:
Baseball
Culture
History
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Movie/Theater Reviews
Politics
Sports
THE NEW YORK TIMES
War


Monthly:
November 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Old Horsefeathers Archives
 

January 11, 2006

LIBERAL LAND: WHERE CHILDHOOD NEVER ENDS

“…As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire
…”
--Rudyard Kipling

        Horsefeathers spent an enjoyable few hours yesterday and today, watching the real ‘Entertainment Network’—C-Span, where the Senate’s Judiciary Committee, a veritable ship of burnt fools, questioned Supreme Court nominee, Judge Samuel Alito. We marveled at his ability to refrain from laughing aloud during the endless speechifying lectures, disguised as questions, from those paragons of virtue, Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy. Perhaps the glasses of liquid he occasionally sipped contained shots of Gentleman Jack, but we suspect the good Judge possesses great reservoirs of self- restraint. Senator Kennedy was especially choice, as he displayed his concern for the helpless, by deploring “Strip search Sam” for a ruling that allowed cops to search a 10 yr. old child of drug dealers. Gee whiz, you might have thought the Judge had endorsed sexual abuse of girls. Oh, sorry, that’s exactly what the moral exemplar from Massachusetts was hoping you’d think. Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comment.
        As our Senators rambled on in high dudgeon about one thing or another, suggesting that Judge Alito was a primitive menace, a greater danger to our freedom than al Qaeda, we couldn’t help but speculate about the origins of their grandiose self regard, moral pomposity and imperviousness to counterargument based on fact. In one respect they seemed quite genuine: they truly believed, not only in the malevolence of the Bush administration but in their own virtue. They really do not, in the modern cant phrase, have “problems of self-esteem”. Their self love is wondrous to behold. The term “narcissism” carries unfortunate clinical overtones, but it remains the best term to describe a completely absorbing self love usually seen only in very young children. Like children, these oafs instantly blotted out of conscious memory their previous humiliation at the hands of Justice Roberts and began repeating the same with Justice Alito. It’s quite wonderful how this self love, a love that never dies, can convince a Joe Biden that the world admires the logorrheic torrent of words he expels, while grinning and straining. Like a child at potty training, he assumes that all who watch and listen must share the evident pride he takes in his verbal discharges. At one point, Mr. Biden may have set a world record for willful incoherence when he consumed 14 minutes of non stop talking to finally emit a question. At the end of his performance, he looked around, proud as a peacock, utterly unaware of what a clownish fool he was making of himself.
        Biden and Kennedy on C-Span, were just the most egregious representatives of the High Church of Liberalism in its contemporary form. They are true believers who dwell in Liberal Land, a place where adults can shed the strains of adulthood. It is a realm of grandiose self-absorption, quite normal in childhood, but increasingly difficult to sustain as reality inflicts its inevitable blows on our high infantile self-regard. Dwelling in Liberal Land means you can assume you’re remarkably intelligent, with great “potential”, regardless of whether you actually know anything. It is a land where utter ignorance of the greatest cultural achievement of modernity—science—is standard, and need not make you feel uneducated or unintelligent. After all, you absorbed the PoMo liturgy in which all inequalities of accomplishment and knowledge are caused by Patriarchal oppression, and for which proper therapeutic empathy is the cure. Words are sacred objects, worthy of veneration. Liberal Land is a realm in which noble sentiments trump deeds and non-verbal accomplishments are scorned and devalued. It is a land in which feminized boys and masculinized girls are praised for their tolerance and for transcending gender differences. Liberal land is a realm in which “narratological truth” trumps mere facts. Liberal Land is where Larry Summers's defense of the scientific method requires him to undergo forced re-education and wimpishly abase himself before the Gods of Liberal cant. It’s a realm in which aggression is definitely not part of human nature, just a consequence of the dehumanizing effects of Patriarchal capitalism.
        In Liberal Land, childhood is sentimentalized, and no social program is too costly if it’s “for the future of our children”, the very children who are being raised by nannys and tutors to be good little P.C. conformists. It’s not possible to sway its inhabitants with logic, fact or rational argumentation. It’s as futile as trying to reason with a small child having a temper tantrum. Liberal Land is a utopian therapeutic realm, where human nature can be transcended and no one need fight over anything, because words can “work it out”. Samuel Johnson answered Boswell’s claim that Bishop Berkeley’s assertion of the non-existence of matter could not be refuted, by kicking at a rock and asserting “I refute it thus”. He surely didn’t anticipate Post-modernism, or the poet Richard Wilbur who wrote: “ Kick at the rock Sam Johnson, break your bones/ But cloudy, cloudy is the stuff of stones”. That makes a clever poetic line, one with ‘narratological’ profundity, perfect for our PoMo aesthetes, but once again, reality asserts itself: those broken bones hurt, and you’d better get to a doctor, rather than a wordsmith intellectual for relief.
        Liberalism has been regressively transformed over the years from a muscular, realistic philosophy into a dreamy set of utopian beliefs and childhood wishes. It has become the philosophy of arrested development. How did this happen? The answer can be discerned in such bastions of Liberal Land as Park Slope in Brooklyn or the Upper West Side of Manhattan.There we find a large proportion of the adult population is the product of elite wordsmith educations: the arts, media, therapeutic professions. These are baby boomers who were told over and over that they were the brightest, most idealistic generation in human history. Despite the passage of the years, they still affect a pose of perpetual adolescence. They think of themselves as exceptionally intelligent, while actually being poorly educated in the sciences and superficially educated in the humanities. They are conformist in their thinking, and have been so ever since they learned to please their teachers and be very good little boys and girls who made their parents proud by becoming good test takers who scored high on their verbal SAT’s. They absorbed the post-modern tenets of their professors, and learned that morality is relative, aggression is a product of social frustration, and criminality requires empathy for the criminal who is a victim of a harsh childhood and capitalist dehumanization. They learned to live well, with little effort, as their parents indulged the dear little proto-metrosexuals with credit cards and tutors. The hypocrisy of their lifestyles never fazed them: while living like the upper 1/10 of 1% of the population—being chauffered to private school so as not to have to ride the subways, being tutored so as not to have to compete on a level playing field with their less affluent peers, they learned to condemn the ‘unfairness’ of capitalism. While differences of achievement were attributed to unfairness and discrimination, requiring that tests be changed, made more culturally sensitive, grades be raised and affirmative discrim—woops—action instituted, other differences, such as sexual preferences—were entirely inborn and innate.
        Liberalism is ideally suited for this constituency, a constituency of those working in the wordsmith professions---media, advertising, the arts, and above all the psychotherapeutic professions. The truth of Hopkins’s “The child is father to the man” is nowhere better illustrated than in these adults and now in their children. Among the latter one can discern the next generation of Bidens, Schumers , Kennedys and Durbins.
        Close observation of these worthies is instructive. Apart from their buffoonish behavior, they offer an overwhelming impression of physical and emotional softness. They are blubbery, full of lip biting displays of feeling for whatever group is victim of the moment. They appear soft and mushy as a freshly baked donut. They are well fed, cosseted men, whom it’s easy to picture in a dress gazing into a mirror while applying mascara. They are the leaders for a generation of sexually ambiguous, politically correct wordsmiths.
        Horsefeathers recently had a conversation with a moderately retarded man who explained that he had voted for Kerry because “Bush is so stupid, such an idiot”. Ordinarily this is a person who is quite aware of his limitations, but he was raised in the true and only faith—Upper West Side Liberalism. To question the belief that Bush is an idiot is like questioning the assumption that Liberals are highly intelligent and caring people. It’s just not possible. Welcome to Liberal Land.





To:


From:


Message (optional):


Comments

Dear Stephen:

Splendid essay on the High Church of Liberalism and its "capped tooth" or "limousine liberals". Today we have seen the moral wrath of the illberal Liberal Inquisition. We are at war with Al Qaida -which sooner or later will hit us with a WMD -it is just a matter of time 1 year 10 years 20 years and the Imperial Bureaucrats are squabbling over icons (so to speak).

I, being a working man, was not able to see the whole CSPAN inquisition. But it is clear that the (Social Democratic Samgerite Feminist Alliance) aka the Democrats are trying to damn Alioto by linking him to conversvative groups and magazines. They did every thing but say are you now or have you ever been a Popish Recusant? Here he is a Knight of America, of of the last of the noble Tribunes, a man who represents the very last of his breed:
A PRINCETON ROTC man. Because he was a man of principles and courage then now he is being crucified. Fortunately for Alioto, Bush won the election and fortunately the Republicans control the Senate. The real reason the Democrats are screaming is that because they have ceased to be a popular party. Therefore the judiciary is ceasing to be their job factory and their power base. As Republicans appoint Federal Judges and Supreme Court nominees their power-like the Slave Power of the 1840's and 1860's- is steadily eroding.

The Democrats have not won over 50% of the national vote since 1976 and really 1964 AND think of it 1948 were their last great years. Since the period of time post 1968 (and McGovern's rule committee) they have been in an inexorable decline.

This decline is so evident by these tawdry hearings.
Can you imagine the row if Ruth Bader Ginsburg's ultra liberal connections and associations had been aired when Clinton appointed her? By comparison the Republicans like Hatch are gentlemen because they knew there was nothing wrong with Ms. Ginsburg in the sense of being unfit for the office. Are religious conseratives such as Mormons, Evangelical Protestesants, Observant Jews, Roman Catholics, Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodoxn are excluded? (especially if they dare to believe in and practice their religion???).

But of course Sangerites, ACLU types, are OK because they are 'mainstream' (sic),

Alioto is not unfit for office either UNLESS we have de facto reinstutied the Test Act of 1673 and now, religious tests are REQUIRED for all non Secularists. IIn that case the liberals should resurrect Bella Abzug and clone her. It is funny by I know Chuck Schumer would vote without blinking an eye for Bella's mummy over Alioto. Better a dead liberal mummy than a live "Dummy" hidebound conservative.

I hope I live to see the Democratic party go the way of the Whigs. It would be better for America. I was a Democrat for all my qualfied years in the 20th century but as far as I am concerned the Democratic Party of FDR, Truman, Kennedy, Scoop Jackson and Moynihan is dead and beyond resucitation.

The real problem of course is Al Qaida and the coming fall of Western Europe. Over 50 % of the children born in France in 2005 (and other select European regions) were Muslims or non-Europeans.

Al Qaida delenda est. Al Qaida must be destroyed! That is the real question before us? We must Praise the Lord, have strong families and pass the ammunition. We are going to need plenty of all these things. The wars with the New Barbarians will drag on for years, for decades, perhaps generations. Iran is an enemy state today but tomrrow France may also become an enemy state when Notre Dame goes the way of Haggia St Sophia.

Not a pretty picture but the Democrats fiddle while our Rome -the Western Word- burns.

Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 12, 2006 12:43 AM

Watching the last couple hearings has brought me to the same conclusion, TERM LIMITS! Oh yes I know, but seniority for my states BIG DOG’s will be lost. I say great to that. The only reason Kennedy is still an embarrassment to our governing system is senior status and the perks associated. Do we really think Don Young from Alaska could have jammed Bridge’s to nowhere through, without his and Steven’s senior status?

We need to reform that system, the arrogance of those untouchable politicians leads to ethics issues on both sides of the isle. Not one of them should hold higher status than the other, just like my vote means no-more than yours. That would reduce the sensationalism and grand standing by many.

Posted by: akabaseball [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 12, 2006 11:02 AM

Term limits indeed! To give an example of the laziness and lack of imagination of Massachussetts voters and the longevity of Teddy Kennedy aka the F.R.K. (Fat Rich Kid) he came into the Senate (with no qualifications by the way other then being President John F. Kennedy's younger brother) in 1962 and is still bloviating in 2005. Imagine a man enters the Senate in 1862 (the year of Antietam and Shiloh and of the first term of President Lincoln) and he is still pontificating in 1905 (the year of the Russo-Japanese War and Teddy Roosevelt as President). The F.R.K. who should have been thrown out on his fat derrierre in 1969 has become a mean spirited, nasty human being. Ann Coulter may be over the top at times but she did say (to paraphrase her) someone ought to say to Ted Kennedy in response to his hectoring over theoretical questions - "we will drive over that bridge when we get to it."

Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comment.

Posted by: Ripper [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 13, 2006 10:17 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


<< Back to Horsefeathers

 

Favorite Links

Pajamas Media
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Politics Central
Michael Yon
Victor Hanson
Mideast Outpost
Captain's Quarters
ChicagoBoyz
Faultline USA
SteveForPrez
Democracy Project
Iowahawk
Instapundit
News Forum
Hotair
Real Clear Politics
Counterterrorism Blog
Ace of Spades
Contentions
Mark Steyn
Bookworm
Gateway Pundit
PoliPundit
Transatlantic Intelligencer
Sisu
Villainous Company
Bill Whittle
Eye on the UN
Armavirunque
Cox & Forkum
Michelle Malkin
Baseball Crank
Terry Teachout
No Pasaran
Power Line
Hugh Hewitt
Jihad Watch
Kim du Toit
Dhimmi Watch
Steven Plaut
Belmont Club
Scott Burgess
The Anti-Idiotarian
Insomnomaniac
Politburo Diktat
Iraq the Model
Roger Simon
Mediacrity
Shrinkwrapped
Neo-neocon
American Thinker
New English Review
Baseball Musings
Eternity Road
Heretical Ideas
The Iconoclast
Intellectual Conservative
Vodkapundit
The Corner
Davids Medienkritik
Samizdata
Volokh Conspiracy
Dinocrat
Scott Ott
Milt's File
Daily Pundit
Google
Search WWW Search www.doctor-horsefeathers.com


Extras

Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Design by Sekimori