Search






Recent Entries

TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE

TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER

PURSUIT OF PLEASURE

RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE"

OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT

GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS

Spitzer Agonistes

BUSH IS TO BLAME

TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS

AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA




Archives

Category:
Baseball
Culture
History
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Movie/Theater Reviews
Politics
Sports
THE NEW YORK TIMES
War


Monthly:
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Old Horsefeathers Archives
 

March 23, 2006

SCREWING UP THE SCHOOLS


Horsefeathers guest blogger Rita Kramer on what’s wrong with New York City’s schools


Whether it’s running a war or running a school system, look out for leaders who don’t know what they’re doing. New York’s Mayor Bloomberg was voted into office promising to make a success of the city’s wildly unworkable schools. He knew nothing about education, shopped around for advice, and made an unfortunate choice in his schools chancellor. Joel Klein, a successful attorney for government and big business, knew nothing about education either. Both men know about management, and in their naivete about teaching and learning, fell prey to the proponents of the very ideology that has corrupted the system they set out to reform. Those reforms look good on paper—abolishing the top-heavy bureaucracy of the Brooklyn-based Board of Education, and improving test scores (although the statistics are a little like three-card monty—they are open to various interpretations). They bought into a set of ideas that, although dear to an influential faction in the education establishment, has been discredited by research and classroom teaching experience. You have to turn over the right card to find any meaningful improvement in the schools, and you may find it’s not there.

Just ask a parent whose child is being subjected to “whole language” or “fuzzy math” as a way of learning to read (recognizing words from their context rather than learning to sound out letters) or to solve arithmetical problems (an approximate answer is good enough as long as the student gets the general idea of how it’s done; no more memorization or rote drill, it’s the concept that counts, not arriving at the right answer).

Or ask a middle- or high-school student who’s taking a course in American history. He or she is more likely to be familiar with the particulars of the Iriquois League than those of the U.S. Constitution. And to know more about the sins of his country than about the foundations and evolution of its democratic institutions.

And still all this is only the tip of the iceberg. Beneath the changes in what children learn and how they are taught lies the bedrock of a point of view, a way of looking at education, an ideology. Not many parents of schoolchildren and even fewer members of the public are aware of how the schools have been corrupted in the name of a distorted idea of equality, not of opportunity but of outcome. Schooling has become less about transmitting knowledge than effecting social change.

The goal of the public school system is no longer really educational so much as it is political. The schools are thought to exist not to teach anything considered of particular value in itself so much as to achieve the aim of educating everyone alike. When “all children are gifted,” as one New York City principal was recently quoted, no children are gifted, and there is no need for classes designed for gifted children. The Utopian ideal is that ever child should come out equal at the end.

Well, perhaps not quite. Some, to drag out that Orwellian warhorse again, feel entitled to be more equal than others, a claim they justify on the grounds of past group suffering. A vast contest seems underway to determine who among us can claim to have been most victimized and to award preferences accordingly.

For some, in the words of a recent graduate of a prestigious school of education, it means “putting in place the women’s agenda.” Or the African-American agenda. Or, as the dean of a California university’s school of education puts it, “Curriculum is not about content, it’s about empowerment.” Pressed for her meaning she adds, “It doesn’t matter so much what you teach; what matters is whose interests are forwarded.

The educational process has not only been politicized, it has been reoriented toward what might be called the psychopathology of education. Until recently, the model of the student was the more or less normal child. Now, with various legislative innovations brought about by special interest groups, it has become the abnormal –“special” is the preferred euphemism—child, and in order to teach such children there has had to be a massive shift of resources. Today the education culture is dominated by learning pathologies and the methods appropriate to the student with learning difficulties—what might be called educational therapy.

The education culture is dominated by the illusion that everyone is the same, when what is needed is to design different systems for different kinds of students. Everyone needs a foundation in the basic skills of literacy and numeracy; beyond that there are some for whom an academic program is the right fit and some who are motivated in other directions. It is no longer true in our mobile society that “tracking” has irreversible consequences. It is possible to return to school at any age, to go on to college or university at any time of life and to study almost anything except the most highly technical and specialized courses of study. The system can be enormously flexible for the highly motivated individual. And it can be made even more so if we recognize individual distinctions rather than pretending that there is no such thing.

What is needed is to maintain standards while at the same time keeping doors open. Instead, the public school system is being debased and fragmented. The common culture is under attack as white-male-dominated and Eurocentric. Racial and ethnic separatism are emphasized, in the name of “self-esteem.” Bilingual programs are leaving many of the children who live in this country without a working knowledge of the English language. How will that benefit them in later life unless Spanish has become the nation’s official language? Hard work and discipline are deemphasized, content is trivialized, and accountability ignored. No one wants to find out what the results of these policies actually are for those children most in need of help. No one is concerned about whether they are being educated in any real sense, whether they are being introduced to the glories of the past, the science that keeps changing the world almost day to day, the arts that enrich life, the literature that opens windows on other times and other places. The partisans of these policies and the curricula they foster are not really interested in education at all; what interests them is a political agenda.

Since what matters to the educrats entrenched in the institutions that train school administrators and professors for other teacher training institutions is not whether children have learned anything of value, but that no one fail to pass, the threshold is lowered as required for almost anyone to get by with a minimum of effort. And criticism is effectively muzzled with the threat of the charge of “racism” against even lifelong liberals, like the charge of “sexism” that recently brought down Harvard’s president Summers. The “multicultural” and “global” approach that sounds so good on paper is in practice a thinly disguised rejection of American values and institutions and of the very idea that underneath all the variety of backgrounds we are and should continue to be one nation, one culture.

These are the things that Messrs. Bloomberg and Klein should go about correcting, not raising scores on dumbed-down tests that prove nothing in the way of real progress. But first they would have to become aware of what, beyond the slogans, really goes on in the classroom.

Rita Kramer is the author of “Ed School Follies: The Miseducation of America’s Schools.”





To:


From:


Message (optional):


Comments

Slightly off topic - I always laugh when the UFT has radio ads talking about "our kids" and how dedicated the teachers are. As someone who has done plenty of substitute teaching in NYC public schools I can say that most of the teachers cannot stand their "kids." As for "dedication" I would say that one-third of the teachers are outstanding, one-third are horrible (people who cannot get a job in private industry so therfore need civil service), and one-third are average and just biding their time until retirement and are interested in just making more money, not getting killed in class, more pension and time off.

Posted by: Ripper [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 23, 2006 10:14 AM

God knows the British school system is fucked up enough. But one thing I can say: everyone took a good look at "whole word" learning and "fuzzy maths" and, a few years ago, it was decided - with parents and Government leading the way - to dump them in favour of phonics and real maths. The result has not been overwhelming, but without a doubt the long downwards slide has been arrested - the worst problem now is discipline.

Posted by: Paolo [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 23, 2006 05:01 PM

“What is needed is to maintain standards while at the same time keeping doors open.”

TRUE Perhaps our community colleges will come to the rescue to those who want to remediate their education. They are run on a voucher basis of course.

“Instead, the public school system is being debased and fragmented. The common culture is under attack as white-male-dominated and Eurocentric.”

TRUE And I would add, though Rita probably wouldn’t, the common Judeo-Christian ethical culture is under attack too. Hence the “War on Christmas” and recently even “bunny rabbits” and innocent “Happy Easter” signs paid for by private individuals are being prohibited by bureaucrats in public places. What to say at such a time? Happy Holidays or Season’s Greetings? A little stale I think by then. How about a drunken orgy for “Spring Break” instead. Cheers!
“Racial and ethnic separatism are emphasized, in the name of “self-esteem.” Bilingual programs are leaving many of the children who live in this country without a working knowledge of the English language. How will that benefit them in later life unless Spanish has become the nation’s official language?”

TRUE if we are talking about PHONEY BILINGUALISM that is to say NENLI (Non-English Native Language Instruction). At least in California Prop 227 seems to have had a transformative effect. Instruction in the English medium is now the norm. Authentic bilingualism and multilingualism will continue to be valuable. All of my children are fluent speakers of Spanish (and naturally speak the lingua franca that is a sina qua non: ENGLISH).
Nonetheless, as Victor Davis Hanson has written English, is rapidly becoming the first language of the second generation of immigrants via popular culture. Spanish literacy cannot be, on average very high.
Many people are heritage speakers but few –in most California communities- read and write Spanish at a higher level than the fourth or fifth grade. The only thing that sustains the Spanish speaking community is a high rate of immigration from Spanish speaking countries. That may or may not continue. But cultural illiteracy is very high. Every student knows who “Lil’ Kim” is but few know any framers beyond Washington and fewer know anything about the ratification debates on the Constitution.
In fact the other a day a student asked me what was all the fuss about this ‘RAT’. I wish I could say he was joking but he wasn’t. I kindly and quietly mentioned that it had to do with ARTICLE VII of the Constitution and the term RATIFICATION things he and his classmates should know about for the final exam. He then asked if the final was multiple choice or true false. I am not kidding. I said no. Short answer, terms, identification and short essays.
You see, he has missed 40% of the classes and still hasn’t signed out a book. I told him to listen –he might learn something. I told him to attend classes. I also told him he had essentially turned from a student into an auditor UN OYENTE that is to say one who hears a few lessons now and then but has no chance to obtain credit in this term perhaps not in this decade.
I did inform him there was an Adult School class offered from 6pm to 9PM and if he completed –oh say- two or three classes a year- he might graduate in the year 2010 or 2015. Naturally, he would have to supply his own transportation and buy his own books.’ This used to bring a profound silence to the students –some still listen- but today there is a new petulant, angry, aggressive attitude. Because they the students by and large don’t care. How they expect to earn a living except by a life of crime or the dole of state-provided welfare I do not know. It is almost enough to make one consider Margaret Sanger’s teachings seriously (almost- unfortunately the more educated the person the more like one is to embrace Sanger’s teachings and practice a “dud-in-the-mud” lifestyle.)
There are still, Thank God, exceptions, but generally speaking America is rearing an entire generation of historically and culturally illiterate children. This is not my personal opinion –though this is confirmed by my teaching experience and travels- but is according to the Department of Education NAEP report on US history.

“Hard work and discipline are deemphasized, content is trivialized, and accountability ignored.”

TRUE…..let’s have another ‘reform’. Let’s have more group work. Let’s have more cooperative learning. Teacher-Ed colleges Dewey-centered Madrasas of Indoctrination. Teacher-Ed should be turned over ENTIRELY to Master Teachers at the local school district level. No one who has not been in a k-12 classroom as a teacher for at least 10 years should ever be a teacher ed teacher (nor an administrator for that matter).

“The partisans of these policies and the curricula they foster are not really interested in education at all; what interests them is a political agenda.”

This is very true in most cases but if you get a chance read the excellent essay on THOMAS SOWELL in the WSJ today. Professor Sowell emphasized THOUGHT AND EDUCATION not indoctrination as a teacher.

Thank you Rita for your informed voice on education. Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammuniton we are going to need plenty of both if we are to survive this 4th Jihad. That may be the main reason public schools will need to be transformed or abandoned.

Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 25, 2006 07:41 PM

“What is needed is to maintain standards while at the same time keeping doors open.”

TRUE Perhaps our community colleges will come to the rescue to those who want to remediate their education. They are run on a voucher basis of course.

“Instead, the public school system is being debased and fragmented. The common culture is under attack as white-male-dominated and Eurocentric.”

TRUE And I would add, though Rita probably wouldn’t, the common Judeo-Christian ethical culture is under attack too. Hence the “War on Christmas” and recently even “bunny rabbits” and innocent “Happy Easter” signs paid for by private individuals are being prohibited by bureaucrats in public places. What to say at such a time? Happy Holidays or Season’s Greetings? A little stale I think by then. How about a drunken orgy for “Spring Break” instead. Cheers!
“Racial and ethnic separatism are emphasized, in the name of “self-esteem.” Bilingual programs are leaving many of the children who live in this country without a working knowledge of the English language. How will that benefit them in later life unless Spanish has become the nation’s official language?”

TRUE if we are talking about PHONEY BILINGUALISM that is to say NENLI (Non-English Native Language Instruction). At least in California Prop 227 seems to have had a transformative effect. Instruction in the English medium is now the norm. Authentic bilingualism and multilingualism will continue to be valuable. All of my children are fluent speakers of Spanish (and naturally speak the lingua franca that is a sina qua non: ENGLISH).
Nonetheless, as Victor Davis Hanson has written English, is rapidly becoming the first language of the second generation of immigrants via popular culture. Spanish literacy cannot be, on average very high.
Many people are heritage speakers but few –in most California communities- read and write Spanish at a higher level than the fourth or fifth grade. The only thing that sustains the Spanish speaking community is a high rate of immigration from Spanish speaking countries. That may or may not continue. But cultural illiteracy is very high. Every student knows who “Lil’ Kim” is but few know any framers beyond Washington and fewer know anything about the ratification debates on the Constitution.
In fact the other a day a student asked me what was all the fuss about this ‘RAT’. I wish I could say he was joking but he wasn’t. I kindly and quietly mentioned that it had to do with ARTICLE VII of the Constitution and the term RATIFICATION things he and his classmates should know about for the final exam. He then asked if the final was multiple choice or true false. I am not kidding. I said no. Short answer, terms, identification and short essays.
You see, he has missed 40% of the classes and still hasn’t signed out a book. I told him to listen –he might learn something. I told him to attend classes. I also told him he had essentially turned from a student into an auditor UN OYENTE that is to say one who hears a few lessons now and then but has no chance to obtain credit in this term perhaps not in this decade.
I did inform him there was an Adult School class offered from 6pm to 9PM and if he completed –oh say- two or three classes a year- he might graduate in the year 2010 or 2015. Naturally, he would have to supply his own transportation and buy his own books.’ This used to bring a profound silence to the students –some still listen- but today there is a new petulant, angry, aggressive attitude. Because they the students by and large don’t care. How they expect to earn a living except by a life of crime or the dole of state-provided welfare I do not know. It is almost enough to make one consider Margaret Sanger’s teachings seriously (almost- unfortunately the more educated the person the more like one is to embrace Sanger’s teachings and practice a “dud-in-the-mud” lifestyle.)
There are still, Thank God, exceptions, but generally speaking America is rearing an entire generation of historically and culturally illiterate children. This is not my personal opinion –though this is confirmed by my teaching experience and travels- but is according to the Department of Education NAEP report on US history.

“Hard work and discipline are deemphasized, content is trivialized, and accountability ignored.”

TRUE…..let’s have another ‘reform’. Let’s have more group work. Let’s have more cooperative learning. Teacher-Ed colleges Dewey-centered Madrasas of Indoctrination. Teacher-Ed should be turned over ENTIRELY to Master Teachers at the local school district level. No one who has not been in a k-12 classroom as a teacher for at least 10 years should ever be a teacher ed teacher (nor an administrator for that matter).

“The partisans of these policies and the curricula they foster are not really interested in education at all; what interests them is a political agenda.”

This is very true in most cases but if you get a chance read the excellent essay on THOMAS SOWELL in the WSJ today. Professor Sowell emphasized THOUGHT AND EDUCATION not indoctrination as a teacher.

Thank you Rita for your informed voice on education. Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammuniton we are going to need plenty of both if we are to survive this 4th Jihad. That may be the main reason public schools will need to be transformed or abandoned.

Posted by: Richard "Ricardo" Munro [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 25, 2006 07:51 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


<< Back to Horsefeathers

 

Favorite Links

Pajamas Media
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Politics Central
Michael Yon
Victor Hanson
Mideast Outpost
Captain's Quarters
ChicagoBoyz
Faultline USA
SteveForPrez
Democracy Project
Iowahawk
Instapundit
News Forum
Hotair
Real Clear Politics
Counterterrorism Blog
Ace of Spades
Contentions
Mark Steyn
Bookworm
Gateway Pundit
PoliPundit
Transatlantic Intelligencer
Sisu
Villainous Company
Bill Whittle
Eye on the UN
Armavirunque
Cox & Forkum
Michelle Malkin
Baseball Crank
Terry Teachout
No Pasaran
Power Line
Hugh Hewitt
Jihad Watch
Kim du Toit
Dhimmi Watch
Steven Plaut
Belmont Club
Scott Burgess
The Anti-Idiotarian
Insomnomaniac
Politburo Diktat
Iraq the Model
Roger Simon
Mediacrity
Shrinkwrapped
Neo-neocon
American Thinker
New English Review
Baseball Musings
Eternity Road
Heretical Ideas
The Iconoclast
Intellectual Conservative
Vodkapundit
The Corner
Davids Medienkritik
Samizdata
Volokh Conspiracy
Dinocrat
Scott Ott
Milt's File
Daily Pundit
Google
Search WWW Search www.doctor-horsefeathers.com


Extras

Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Design by Sekimori