SearchRecent EntriesTELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKETALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER PURSUIT OF PLEASURE RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE" OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS Spitzer Agonistes BUSH IS TO BLAME TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA ArchivesCategory:Baseball Culture History Media Middle East Miscellaneous Movie/Theater Reviews Politics Sports THE NEW YORK TIMES War Monthly: July 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 Old Horsefeathers Archives |
May 14, 2006NEW YORK TIMES EDITORS YEARN FOR PARADISEDuring the A.M. Rosenthal epoch of the New York Times, the editorials were written by serious, educated people—mostly white, middle class men—who had transcended their adolescence, concurred in a set of Western values that had stood the test of time, knew what was important and who they were. The Times has indeed changed. Its editorials seem to be written by ignorant, feckless people, barely out of their jeans and sandals and still in the sway of a social-political fantasy of paradise. So it was that one of the little boobies they let write editorials for the Times now that Abe Rosenthal is gone, decided to celebrate the world of the Nukak tribe last Saturday: “Perhaps you read yesterday’s article about members of the Nukak tribe…who walked out of the Colombian jungle and renounced their ancestral ways….According to witnesses, they say they are happy about it….None of which explain the bittersweet feel this story leaves in the reader’s [the editorial writer’s] mind….We have no clearer idea what it would mean to live a subsistence life in the Colombian jungle than the Nukak have of living even on the fringes of the modern world. [Only, little booby, if you have no intelligent imagination or sense enough to get some anthropological information, so readily available on the internet. See, presumably the difference between you, and them is that you are supposed to be educated.]….it’s hard to escape the feeling that their SELF-SUSTAINING EXISTENCE…WAS HOLDING SOMETHING OPEN FOR US, SOMETHING THAT HAS NOW BEEN LOST.” Ah, the romance of the “bittersweet” life of the “self-sustaining existence!” Paradise regained, eh? Breadfruit dropping from the trees; fresh, silvery, fish jumping out of the sea into the waiting pan; the beautiful, brown skinned Gauguin women in their colorful sarongs—what a life awaits. Oh, yes, the “self-sustaining existence!” Let’s assume that you are a boy editorial writer and you wake up one morning in the Colombian rain forest as part of the Nukak tribe. You’ve gotten your wish. It’s true that you don’t have to worry about that $600,000 mortgage anymore. Your new home is whatever you can see before your eyes—roots, vines, trees, lizards—all mortgage free. You won’t have to worry about whether social security will last until you turn 65, because you won’t turn 65. The elders of the tribe rarely get to be older than their forties—extinguished by malaria, fatal accidents while racing through the jungle after tonight’s dinner, and sometimes eaten by a family of crocodiles while fishing. You don’t have to worry about losing your job anymore. Everyone over the age of twelve in the tribe is employed. In fact in the Nukak tribe life is employment and employment is life. That is all you think about from sunrise until you lay your head on your leafy pillow. There are thirty or forty people in the tribe; more than half are women and children, so you and the ten or fifteen other guys have thirty-five mouths to feed two or three times a day, every day, day in, day out, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year. Except in Nukak land there are no weeks or years, only one same day after another. Sunrise, sunset. There’s no Sports Monday, or Science Tuesday, or Dining Out Wednesday. And certainly no Sunday when you take a day off; or vacations. There is no leisure and thus no such thing as play, or veggeing out, or hanging out. There is only hunting, mostly small monkeys, and also some chachalacas and toucans. In addition you will enjoy rodents, armadillos, frogs and the weevils of wasps and caterpillars prepared according to the time-honored recipes of the region. But you can’t just hunt. You have to have weapons with which to hunt. And you can’t just order your blow-gun from the L.L. Bean catalog, you’ve got to make it, and the darts that go into it and the curare that you put on the tips of the darts that paralyze the prey. All of that takes a lot of work and practice before you start bringing home the monkey. So when you come home from a hard day’s hunting you want a nice hot shower or bath, right? But no one’s ever heard of soap or heating water. Why would you want to heat water, your tribal neighbors ask in amazement. So you go off to find a couple of roots to make a bed between and dream of the old days when you owned a $600,000 mortgage. But what if our booby editorial writer is a girl editor yearning for a conflict-free paradise. A world free of sexual harassment, ass-hole men coming on to you, glass ceilings, biological clocks ticking. Relief. So there you are girl editorial writer, a lady Nukak in the Colombian rain forest—your bittersweet self-sustaining existence awaits you. What do you gather? Palm and many other fruits, honey from bees, vegetal fibers to make your hubby’s loin cloth, and stuff like that. It’s largely back-breaking work and even though there’s no glass ceiling here there is no way that you will ever get to be a hunter. The guy Nukaks would laugh you out of the tribe. How could you run after monkeys while you nurse your infant or are pregnant? Maybe you’re sent to the head man of the tribe and he sends you to the head-shrinker who yells at you and tells you to go back to the women’s part of the camp. Also the men are not very good at small talk with women. They just want to…well, you know what. Just like the guys back at the NY Times. Which by this time is where you wish you were at and hadn’t written that moronic editorial. And here are two or three monographs about life with the Nukaks in case you boobies are still interested: CABRERA, Gabriel; Carlos FRANKY y Dany MAHECHA 1999: Los Nukak: nómadas de la Amazonia colombiana; Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sf. Bogotá D.C.- ISBN 958-8051-35-5 CÁRDENAS, Dairon y Gustavo POLITIS 2000: Territorios, movilidad, etnobotánica y manejo del bosque en los Nukak orientales. Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Bogotá D.C.- ISBN 958-695-035-2 << Back to Horsefeathers |
Favorite LinksPajamas MediaMiddle East Strategy at Harvard Politics Central Michael Yon Victor Hanson Mideast Outpost Captain's Quarters ChicagoBoyz Faultline USA SteveForPrez Democracy Project Iowahawk Instapundit News Forum Hotair Real Clear Politics Counterterrorism Blog Ace of Spades Contentions Mark Steyn Bookworm Gateway Pundit PoliPundit Transatlantic Intelligencer Sisu Villainous Company Bill Whittle Eye on the UN Armavirunque Cox & Forkum Michelle Malkin Baseball Crank Terry Teachout No Pasaran Power Line Hugh Hewitt Jihad Watch Kim du Toit Dhimmi Watch Steven Plaut Belmont Club Scott Burgess The Anti-Idiotarian Insomnomaniac Politburo Diktat Iraq the Model Roger Simon Mediacrity Shrinkwrapped Neo-neocon American Thinker New English Review Baseball Musings Eternity Road Heretical Ideas The Iconoclast Intellectual Conservative Vodkapundit The Corner Davids Medienkritik Samizdata Volokh Conspiracy Dinocrat Scott Ott Milt's File Daily Pundit ExtrasSyndicate this site (XML)Powered by Movable Type 3.11 |
Comments
All right, doctor, consider yourself bookmarked. Great posts; I got here via comments on LGF.
Posted by: MGCC
at May 17, 2006 11:26 AM
Good post, Stephen. However, wasn't it the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden. I never read of the tree of "sexual knowledge" in Protestant or Catholic translations.
Posted by: Mark_Belt
at May 19, 2006 12:35 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)