Search






Recent Entries

TELL IT TO OFFICER KRUPKE

TALKING BACK TO LIBERAL POWER

PURSUIT OF PLEASURE

RAINOUT READING: "ASSIGN YOGI BERRA TO CAPE CANAVERAL; HE COULD HANDLE ANY MISSILE"

OPENING DAY AT THE HOUSE THAT RUTH BUILT

GEERT WILDERS VS THE BARBARIANS

Spitzer Agonistes

BUSH IS TO BLAME

TRADERS CATCHING UP WITH HORSEFEATHERS

AN ARMY OF MURDERERS ROAMS AMERICA




Archives

Category:
Baseball
Culture
History
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Movie/Theater Reviews
Politics
Sports
THE NEW YORK TIMES
War


Monthly:
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Old Horsefeathers Archives
 

March 17, 2007

THE NYTIMES: ADVANCING POST-MODERN LIBERAL IDEOLOGY, ONE GENDER AT A TIME

       A key part of contemporary liberalism's utopian agenda is the elimination of the differences between the sexes. Gender, they inform us, is "socially constructed" hence we can deconstruct the differences between the sexes and create new post-modern selves, not limited by biology. Biology itself is a creation of the patriarchy designed to enslave women.
        The official propaganda organ of Post-modern liberalism, the New York Times, loves to print heart tugging stories of the unfair treatment of BLGT's (bisexuals, lesbians, gays and transgenders). These are usually intended to create guilt in men, and feelings of grievance in women against the 'patriarchy' for insisting on real, biologically derived differences. The great day when men have been completely feminized may still be off in the future, but the Times is always on the alert to celebrate the softer, weepy, side of the metrosexual empaths they call 'men'. Now even male athletes are expected to be acutely aware of and communicative about their feelings. The master of the feigned feeling, Bill Clinton, rode to the Presidency on his ability to shed crocodile tears while feeling your pain.
        It had slipped past Horsefeathers that there is another way to eliminate the differences between the sexes. Even the Times was a bit slow on the uptake, but now they've discovered new cause for celebration. While men are being feminized, women can be masculinized. Hooray for equality! Here's a heartwarming story of girl weightlifters who have rejected the 'stereotype" of the female body, in favor of accumulating the necessary poundage, grotesque musculature and freakish appearance of male weightlifters. The Times breathlessly reports on this latest cultural advance of liberalism. They quote the weightlifting coach of the 261 lb. team leader: "...it’s a great way to get girls involved for gender equity..." Ain't social progress grand?
See the entire story (don't miss the fetching photograph) here.





To:


From:


Message (optional):


Comments

Here's a place to start: Let persuade the NYT to begin referring to athletic teams as "Open" and "Women's," rather than "Men's" and "Women's," on their its sports page (look at NCAA basketball tournament brackets to see what I mean). I am a paid subscriber and have been for years, but if a hundred thousand or so non-wimp male subscribers would pledge to simultaneously pull their NYT plugs on a certain date, I'll go along. Newspapers' revenue is a straight-line function of the length of its subcription list, so we'd get Punch's attention. tyk

Posted by: tyk [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 18, 2007 12:32 PM

To be fair, weightlifting and throwing events (which require equally bulky performers) have always been the refuge of what are euphemistically called "big girls". However, in the past nobody insisted that such girth and muscle were anything but unfeminine; to be able to compete in the Olympics was, shall we say, the consolation prize for being sadly hopelessly plain. To make it a part of a Judith Butler ideological operation is pathetic.

Posted by: Paolo [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 18, 2007 02:43 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


<< Back to Horsefeathers

 

Favorite Links

Pajamas Media
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Politics Central
Michael Yon
Victor Hanson
Mideast Outpost
Captain's Quarters
ChicagoBoyz
Faultline USA
SteveForPrez
Democracy Project
Iowahawk
Instapundit
News Forum
Hotair
Real Clear Politics
Counterterrorism Blog
Ace of Spades
Contentions
Mark Steyn
Bookworm
Gateway Pundit
PoliPundit
Transatlantic Intelligencer
Sisu
Villainous Company
Bill Whittle
Eye on the UN
Armavirunque
Cox & Forkum
Michelle Malkin
Baseball Crank
Terry Teachout
No Pasaran
Power Line
Hugh Hewitt
Jihad Watch
Kim du Toit
Dhimmi Watch
Steven Plaut
Belmont Club
Scott Burgess
The Anti-Idiotarian
Insomnomaniac
Politburo Diktat
Iraq the Model
Roger Simon
Mediacrity
Shrinkwrapped
Neo-neocon
American Thinker
New English Review
Baseball Musings
Eternity Road
Heretical Ideas
The Iconoclast
Intellectual Conservative
Vodkapundit
The Corner
Davids Medienkritik
Samizdata
Volokh Conspiracy
Dinocrat
Scott Ott
Milt's File
Daily Pundit
Google
Search WWW Search www.doctor-horsefeathers.com


Extras

Syndicate this site (XML)

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Design by Sekimori